Via Andrew Weissmann:

My guess: #Trump may have someone like #Musk co-signing Chubb bond, so the bank is comfortable being on the hook for the judgment. Same could happen for the bond for AG $450M judgment. & this strategy wd allow co-signor to say truthfully that they did not give or loan Trump any $

Joyce Vance:

This=important pt. Trump is beholden to someone & we don't know who. Reporters shd ask him to explain all of the details. GOP leaders shd, but probably won't be esp concerned.

@GottaLaff That last part is everything
@GottaLaff as a presidential candidate, are large cash gifts or other items of value considered campaign contributions?
@GottaLaff Flashbacks to how a Russian oligarch paid him almost $100 million for a $50 million house right around the time Trump started with the birtherism BS that discredited and weakened our democracy.
@GottaLaff lol dude had to get a co-signer.
@GottaLaff If Musk co-signed then there are strings attached. When I heard about the two talking about money, I imagined Musk asking to be VP. It's not as crazy as it might sound.
@Brian_Mahoney @GottaLaff well that’s the opposite of a winning ticket. I encourage it.
@Brian_Mahoney @GottaLaff Musk isn’t eligible to be President. He was born in South Africa.
@GottaLaff
That is my guess also!
Musk has been to Blobalardo twice in the recent few weeks.
I hope dummy burns him too!!

@GottaLaff
gop supervising trump?! it is trump's party now, or piggy bank.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-rnc-takeover_n_65eb49cde4b05ec1ccd9cce0

Trump Retakes Control Of RNC, Potentially Opening Up Cash Streams To Pay Legal Bills

His campaign claims it will not use RNC money for that purpose, but last year alone, Trump used $54.2 million raised by his political committees on lawyers.

HuffPost
@zetabeta @GottaLaff Do RICO statutes apply to political parties?
@GottaLaff
If he can get Musk and a shadow sponsor to cover the $450m bond, then you can kiss national security good-bye if he were to reattain the oval office.
@GottaLaff
E Jean doesn't have to accept the bond without knowing the details of how it's guaranteed...same goes for NY except X7.
@GottaLaff So, if a soldier in the US Armed Services is in debt by several thousand dollars, they can be summarily discharged because they present a security risk, but the Commander in Chief can be in debt to a sworn enemy of the republic for millions with no consequences? That's today's GOP!