@mike Still so many wrong assumptions or misinfo out there too. I was talking to my mother just the other day about wanting an EV, and her primary concerns were that there aren't a lot of charging stations around here, and the EVs that died waiting in line to charge during the winter storms.
She seemed genuinely surprised that charging at home was even an option.
@mike some points: The Bolt is on the upper end of cheap, the Model 3 is not.
The closest place to my house I can charge a car is a mile away. Assuming the chargers are working. No garage, old house. Itâs also a problem for folks living in apartments that arenât putting in any kind of chargers.
An ICE car, without a lot of work, can run well for 1-2 decades. EVs canât, a real problem for folks who canât just drop $300+ a month forever along with increased insurance costs.
@mike I can do a lot of repairs on my accord myself. EVs are less home/third-party repairable than an iPad. If you own one out of warranty, $$$$
Increased tire replacement and EV tires are $$$.
Winter is real and to date, EVs fuckinâ suck at winter.
I donât think EVs are dead, but theyâve def. hit the limit of MFers with the money and resources. Thatâs setting aside infra issues like grid, the massive rebuilding of roads/bridges their increased weight requires, etc.
@mike and if we took mass transit as seriously as we do EVs, we would need less cars in population centers, which is a far bigger win than 1:1 ICE -> EV replacement.
But Elonâs elitism/racism towards mass transit is shared by many across the honkie spectrum, so not happening.
@mike I am still waiting on the dumb EV to show up
What I want is a 99 Toyota Camry but powered by electricity
Europe is making an under $10K city car conversion so popular that they can't meet their commitments, and this in a continent with widespread mass transit. In most of the US mass transit was killed, is being killed, and the idea poisoned by bad city planning, and now add to that corporate decisions are guiding us rather than us guiding them to what makes sense. Which is a 90% lower human impact on natural systems, which means significantly less private transportation, by the end of the decade.
@mike also this today:
Electric vehicles are finally turning a profit for Stellantis, CEO Carlos Tavares said Thursday, and, in contrast to some rivals, it will not cut back on producing EVs.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/15/business/stellantis-earnings-electric-vehicles/index.html
@mike @Tiezep Also, worth noting that in the US we are in the middle of a major transition of charging standards, from CCS to NACS.
It is not a terrible idea to wait a year or two if you donât need a new car right now, so you get the more future proof version. This is certainly having some impact on sales.
ah but in our dystopian society
where the only measure is money
of worth, not valuing humanity
we share, is it any mystery
why the poor are perceived
as lesser by schmucks in towers ivory?
:)
@mike The auto industry has been paralyzed for years by a need to other electric cars. They *must* be niche, or weird-looking, or somehow exotic. Tesla gets credit for making electric cars that actually look like cars, which was progress, but even then. Genuinely innovative and affordable startups like Canoo and Aptera struggle to get capital while Rivian fields a six-figure, 7,000 pound beast and wonders why it still can't make any money.
For all that we're supposed to admire capitalism for disruption and innovation, there's been precious little of either.
Green capitalism.
Now the rich can speak to their pet politician about how they're saving the climate while flying on their private jet.