Me: can i work from home?
employer: no.
Me: why? why not?
employer: we own too much real estate.
Me: can i work from home?
employer: no.
Me: why? why not?
employer: we own too much real estate.
@NumbersCanBeFun @nixCraft @notkudu with the greatest of respect, I think you might have misunderstood OP. I agree with your point that not every job can be remote, that's very much common sense and you're right about it. But that's not the point OP was making, they were saying, if a job can be realistically be done remotely, why not allow for that, instead of forcing people back in the office because you've invested in it. I happen to agree with that - I'd be interested to hear any reasons that you'd disagree with it?
Either way, have a good day! 
That sounded nutty to me at first.
Then all sorts of articles came out about that subject.
The situation is really an environmental gift that should be promoted. There doesn't seem to be any other way to get people to use their cars much less and be happy about it.
Homeless people? Housing shortage? You now have many unused buildings.