@CRGonzalez @chrisjrn c’mon #Boston what are we waiting for?!

In particular, what’s going on with the bus system that was supposed to be updated in ‘23?

#MAPol #transportation

@CRGonzalez @tsyum @chrisjrn good transit systems actually do recoup serious money from transit fares - to remove fares in those cases would result either in cut service or additional taxes (that would probably be better spent on additional service)

for example, King County Metro (Seattle) covers 25-30% of its operating expenses with fares; that would mean making fares free would result in a cut to service of a quarter to a third

@streganil if 35% of its expenses are related to collecting and enforcing fares, and only 30% of its income is from the fares, then removing fares makes economic sense.

One small "downside": some people may use it who didn't use it when it wasn't free, to get to places they need or want to go - and that's fine too, it means they're not driving, which saves money on road maintenance and public health. It doesn't cost any more unless they all decide to travel at peak times and need more buses.

@hutchingsmusic @streganil excellently explained, but one minor proviso. I can't remember the exact multiplier, but I recall that because of their weight/size, buses are actually much harder on roads than cars, possibly by a factor of 10 or more. If that number is right, nobody should expect savings on road maintenance unless a given bus gets 10 cars off the road, which might be tall order.

[EDIT: OTOH, buses limit the damage to their specific routes]