The Oscars, historically:
* Black people were rarely nominated.
* Women often had to endure sexual assault to win one.
* The 3 most thanked people in acceptance speeches, in order, were Spielberg, Weinstein, then God. That says it all.

How can anyone feel good about winning one under these circumstances?

Not surprised that Barbie was snubbed. Excuse me... Ryan Gosling was nominated, because irony is dead. And "Best film" but not "Best Director" or "Best Actor," because women's credit must be shared.

Best song, and best costume, because yes, they were great.

The weird thing about Greta Gerwig is that she's not a great director. (Clearly, she hasn't won an Oscar! Didn't even get nominated this time!)

🤔And yet, Best Picture nominated movies keep directing themselves around her somehow? 3 for 3?

We exist in a world where we pretend that the societal impact of the art that was Oppenheimer, is somehow greater than the societal impact of the art that was Barbie.

That Margot Robbie didn't show out like Cillian Murphy did. But she wore great costumes! Dress up! Pretty girl!

And in case anyone thought I was just being hyperbolic about the "Spielberg, Weinstein, then God" thing:

https://www.newsweek.com/oscars-harvey-weinstein-thanked-more-god-according-2015-analysis-681593

At Oscars, Harvey Weinstein Thanked More Than God, According to 2015 Analysis

Steven Spielberg was first among people thanked in Oscar speeches. God was sixth.

Newsweek

And you can't tell me that that Oppenheimer Trinity explosion scene was awesome. It wasn't! IDC!

It was like the 5th biggest explosion in a throwaway installment of a Michael Bay franchise. I've seen better explosions burning more diesel when Bumblebee trips and sits on a trash can.

But there's nothing noble about piling up thousands of pounds of diesel in the middle of the desert for a mid explosion. Retvrn? No. Retvrn to common sense. Use CGI for nukes. Like in T2, judgement day.

@mekkaokereke I appreciated it was somewhat underwhelming, felt like it avoided glorifying the weapon. Still could’ve been done with CG of course.

@alec @mekkaokereke

The only reason to not use CGI for the central nuclear explosion in a movie about that nuclear explosion, is if you're using historical footage. In fact, historical footage+CGI could have been an awesome way to go.

It's beside the point though. I'm sure Oppenheimer is a very deserving movie, but Barbie is the most innovative movie of the decade. That deserves recognition.

@mcv @mekkaokereke I think they would have been better off not showing the explosion at all really, not directly. The flash and sound, but only the reactions of all the people.
@mekkaokereke Funny, I purposefully went and saw Oppenheimer in 70mm because of the expected scale of those FX and ... 70mm REALLY is good for facial closeups in tense courtroom dramas.
@mekkaokereke agreed, that Trinity explosion was not impressive...
@mekkaokereke You know that The Creator used the actual footage of the Beirut explosion making money from an actual explosion which killed over 200 people and injured thousands right? Is this more noble? https://screenrant.com/the-creator-movie-trailer-explosion-beirut-footage-response/

@ruffson

😮😮😮

Editing. Finding a better example. That is disgusting.

Thank you for telling me!

@mekkaokereke @ruffson I heard that it was plate footage and not intended to be released in the trailer.

Like, they splice together inspiration shots to get a feel then replace them as they put the trailer together.

The Beirut explosion footage is not in the film.

@ruffson @Kowfm @mekkaokereke I hope what you say is true. Releasing the trailer with the footage is, on its own, a horrifying lapse in ethics.
@meltedcheese @ruffson @mekkaokereke I don't want to shill out for corporations, but marketing departments make mistakes like this all the time. Example: The Terminator 2 marketing ruining the twist in all the trailers.
@ruffson @mekkaokereke I remember when westerns had to show a disclaimer saying, “No horses were injured during the making of this film.” It was important. In the credits to “The Creator” are they going to say, “hundreds of people were killed, thousands injured and hundreds of thousands were left homeless during the making of this film.” It’s the truth if they actually use the explosion footage from Beirut. And we should pay to see it? No way.

@mekkaokereke yes!

I kept thinking… we’ve all seen real nuclear explosions before. Like, from actual film. If you can’t match real ones that we’ve already seen (which you can’t if you’re not blowing up an actual nuke), then whatever you make out of practical explosions will be worse than the real thing

@mekkaokereke

And I am okay with that.

I always think (to switch paradigm slightly), that athletes who thank their god should have to give their awards back. You are supposed to do that shit on your own. Divine help is cheating.

@Edelruth @mekkaokereke I am actually surprised “god” came in only 6th since thanking any one of the others is way more specific.

But either way, not quite the point.

@Edelruth @mekkaokereke There’s a rule in formula one that reads “the driver must drive the car alone and unaided”. So yeah, you thank god there and by definition you should be instantly disqualified.

@mekkaokereke

https://www.oscars.org/about/join-academy

Possible weaknesses in this process:

1. Limited Access: The membership process relies on sponsorship by existing Academy members, which could limit access to individuals who may be deserving but lack connections within the industry.

2. Subjectivity: The requirement for candidates to have "demonstrated exceptional achievement" is subjective and may lead to biases in the selection process.

3. Lack of Transparency: The criteria for admission are not explicitly defined, making it unclear how the Academy assesses candidates' achievements.

4. Annual Review: Membership reviews occur only once a year, potentially causing delays for qualified candidates who miss the deadline.

5. Limited Sponsorship Options: Members-at-Large can only be sponsored by other Members-at-Large, which may restrict opportunities for diverse candidates.

Academy Membership

WHOAcademy membership is limited to film artists working in the production of theatrically-released motion pictures. The Academy has 18 branches, for the crafts ranging from Actors to Writers, and the Members-at-Large category, for individuals who work in motion pictures as a representative.The requirements for each branch and category can be found by clicking here.HOW The Academy’s membership process is by sponsorship, not application.

Oscars.org | Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences
@mekkaokereke You just made me feel really seen, as a chick, tonight. I high-five you, my friend. TY for your allyship! <3
@mekkaokereke
Honestly Oppenheimer was so terribly boring I had to force myself to sit through it. 3 hours (without the entertainment/cognitive break that is bollywood numbers, mind) of name dropping, time jumping, not passing the Bechdel Test, and passing the Sexy Lamp test to boot does not a good movie make 😑
@kavana @mekkaokereke fully agree. Actually the best scene was the interrogation of his wife. Emily Blunt was amazing! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1xrBobulfJ4
Oppenheimer | Emily Blunt

YouTube

@nicolegoebel @kavana @mekkaokereke

I saw both films in theaters within a few weeks of each other last summer. The crowd reaction to Barbie, especially the women in the audience, was fabulous. OTH, my background is physics and I’ve worked at Los Alamos, so steeped in the history of the place and an Oppenheimer fan. I really wanted to like the film (saw it in an IMax theater) but mostly what I remember is that it was very long.

@wa7iut @nicolegoebel @kavana @mekkaokereke It tried really hard to be Important and have Meaning.
I was dozing off for most of it
@kavana @mekkaokereke My parents recently watched Oppenheimer and struggled to follow the time jumps 😅 They haven't seen Barbie, but I guarantee they wouldn't have trouble following the film xD
@mekkaokereke Cillian Murphy is a great actor- no detracting from him. And I haven't seen "Oppenheimer" yet, but I have seen Barbie, and I double dare any mother fucker to try to say Margot Robbie doesn't deserve the nomination for best actor for that performance.
She was amazing in that role. The emotional range, the sometimes subtlest of changes to a facial expression that transformed the emotional content. A powerful performance.

@TessRants

Someone else was incensed that her constant hair make up changes weren't noted. Best Hair and Make up? To someone else?

Rightly incensed.

@mekkaokereke

@mekkaokereke I am happy to hear Ryan calling bullshit.
@mekkaokereke it's like the nominations make Barbie's point for it?
@mekkaokereke I just read Goslings statement about it. Utterly mind boggling that the guy got nominated, but the two women who put him there are not. I honestly think it's about time these corporate clownshows were laid to rest permanently, and replaced with proper shows run by actual human beings, not wallets with faces.
Ryan Gosling Criticizes Margot Robbie, Greta Gerwig Oscars Snubs

The actor has issued a detailed statement about his director and co-star missing out on two key Oscar nominations: "To say I'm disappointed would be an understatement."

The Hollywood Reporter
@ricardoharvin @TacticalGrace_ I SERIOUSLY hope he wears that exact outfit, to the Oscars!
@mekkaokereke I'm so chuffed that America Ferrera got a well-deserved nomination, though!
@mekkaokereke I don't want to get too alarmist here, but I believe there may be some blind spots and/or flaws in the methodology of the contest that movie industry insiders created for themselves and use as a publicity event.
@mekkaokereke
It's also nice that America Ferrera got nominated.
Not an argument against the film being snubbed, I just want to hold space for both. I'm seeing a lot more people talk about Ryan Gosling's nom, and not many talking about hers. She really deserves it!

@ARG @mekkaokereke I’m hoping this comes out properly.

I am in no way saying this makes up for not being in one of the *major* categories, but I feel like folks are outright ignoring the fact that GG is up for Best Adapted Screenplay (along with her partner) and Margot Robbie is a producer and would therefore receive an Oscar for Best Picture. Like, I completely understand that they both should have been recognized more fully, and that there’s a huge difference between solo acknowledgment and team wins, but also I feel like we shouldn’t end up devaluing what they *have* been nominated for, or how important those awards have been for others.

@mekkaokereke it'll always be ironic to me that @KevinSmith made Jersey Girl (perfect Oscar bait) and is an Academy voter, and that film was never considered. When that happened, I stopped caring. Watching it unravel over the years has been fun.
@mekkaokereke I know people who vote in the Academy. The whole process is total bullshit. They’re sent “gifts” (read bribes) by various actors and studios to get votes. I know of one person who, when they didn’t know who to pick for a technical category, would put copies of the movies on the floor and let the dog pick.

@mekkaokereke > Spielberg, Weinstein, then God

Now there's a sentence for the ages. It took me five seconds for the penny to drop.

@mekkaokereke I stopped caring about any of these award shows years ago. Recognizing people is a good thing, but these platforms are not a great indicator of quality. They are definitely not fair or equitable.