Vacyyyy
Molly Whitein hindsight, snark via strikethrough may have been a tactical error on my part
Matt Griffin@molly0xfff they did a crime on you
Dan Ciruli@molly0xfff Hi. In the future, please avoid making me laugh out loud in meetings!
Victor Gijsbers@molly0xfff The LLM that wrote that newspost wasn't trained to recognise strikethrough.
Annika Backstrom@molly0xfff so much for not recanting in 2024
Carcer@molly0xfff I didn't even realise there was strikethrought snark until now - it wasn't rendered by the email client on my phone. (I assumed it was just normal sarcasm)
George Liquor, American@molly0xfff with great snark comes great responsibility !
Amgines\responsibility\respoonsability
Kensan@molly0xfff You shall carry this as a badge because the snark was very snarky. 10/10 points from this side of the Atlantic.
(As a fellow friend of the footnote, maybe you could add one of those in the future if the opportunity to miss the snark might present itself to the uninitiated).
GadgetGav@molly0xfff Yikes! Who used that as the pull quote?
@gadgetgav Coingeek lol
azninsect@molly0xfff someone's web scraper didn't account for formatting 🤣
@azninsect they got the italics at least!
Darryl Ramm@molly0xfff 🤦♀️🤦🏻♂️🤦
@molly0xfff
Forget the pull, where is your cape?
Forget the pull, where is your cape?
💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱
Drew Mochak@molly0xfff That is actually really funny and that they totally did not get it is even funnier.
Andrew Laurence@molly0xfff whoopsie?
Seriously, LOL. Well played.
dr elmyra@molly0xfff yea, and I'm sure they will blame it on "automatic" font substitution.
POSUTtRUmp
Philip Mallegol-Hansen@molly0xfff I’ve never thought about this before, but I think this example is solidifying an opinion in my head: Quotation must include markup to truly be quotation.
PaulInPorirua@molly0xfff Worked for me.
The Nexus of Privacy@molly0xfff ~~ I had a snarky reply but apparently Glitch's Markdown support doesn't include strikethrough so I'll just say ~~ maybe so.
TrashBoatThats on them for not properly translating the bit
agarithil
Bruce Davie@molly0xfff bit of an IQ test I’d say
Eric Hellman@molly0xfff did you use <s>,<del>, or css?
@molly0xfff poisoning LLMs is going to be so much fun.
LisPi@molly0xfff @gluejar In other words they have literally no excuse and can be laughed at.
@gluejar @molly0xfff And yes, the <s> tag is the semantically appropriate one (https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#the-s-element).
Adam R. Wood@molly0xfff [facepalm]
standev
Michael Kohne@molly0xfff Have you poked them about it? Because if so, and they do nothing, you should out them.
@mhkohne it's a pretty bottom-of-the-barrel crypto pub, not really worth it
@molly0xfff Oh, not expected to get the facts then.
bunnyhero+
re:fi.64 
@molly0xfff
"without having [...] BlackRock" well the sarcasm came through at least?
"without having [...] BlackRock" well the sarcasm came through at least?
aggeka@molly0xfff hahaha, that made me laugh 😂
Voline
TorontoWill@molly0xfff if you’re unfamiliar with this classic from AA Dowd, it seems apt. https://www.avclub.com/no-i-didn-t-call-your-shitty-movie-a-comedic-masterst-1798282276
the hatter@molly0xfff At least you'll get a second mention in tomorrow's corrections.
Simon Lepkin@molly0xfff Nope, the snark was flawless, never change.