@misc I never had a huge follower count on Twitter to begin with, maybe around 100 people. I've only got 54 follows on Mastodon.
It's only happened a couple of times on Mastodon so far, but I've had some of my posts get over 50 boost and likes. Maybe not a lot, but nothing I've ever done on twitter got me that level of engagement.
Freedom of the Press Foundation has 1% of the nominal followers that it has on Twitter/X, but many of the individual posts have seen more engagement here.
You may find my "eXit spreadsheet" useful to look at how other orgs are faring -- some who've focused on the fediverse for even just a year have exceeded their followers on Twitter/X as well.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1p5crRGK0Y9MuFsfkyOBEC--3wXxFTd71fPCUcIFPXK0/edit#gid=0
@misc A German IT Magazine wrote about their first year on Mastodon
A tale of two polls: both ran for two days and were boosted halfway through. Twitter: 22 votes from 6,949 followers. Mastodon: 83 votes from 975 followers. If you're still posting to the Nazi Hellsite because "but muh engagements", you really don't have to keep doing that. Speaking of, please follow us on Mastodon! It really is better. Come on in, the water's fine. We are ...
@misc Following #hashtags dramatically changed how I engage with a social platform. I built my own algorithm, effectively, and I see posts on topics that interest me along with other users who share that interest. The hashtags help me find who might be fun to follow.
Because of those shared interests, my posts tend to be read by people likely to interact on those topics.
The posts I see here make me feel happier and more connected. So I come back & The circle continues.
@misc : it is in French, but in those two pieces, I explain, with examples, how the followers count is mostly a lie and how people got a lot more engagement on Mastodon (taking the example of a Signal message)
https://ploum.net/2023-10-29-le-droit-de-supprimer-twitter.html
https://ploum.net/2023-07-23-pour-une-poignee-de-followers.html
@misc My opensource-project (@MapComplete) did! The Twitter and Mastodon-accounts were setup at the same time. During the big migration waves, I went out of my way to type a welcome message and explanation of what the project is about...
Which also means I'm failing your requirement, because it has now about 4 times the amount of followers here compared to twitter...
In either case, way more enthusiasm here!
@jdp23 @misc Higher engagement (quantitatively assessed) isn't a great metric, though I've seen numerous reports of higher and more meaningful levels of engagement w a smaller audience here.
"Activists" gaming algorithms is what has made monetized social media a toxic hellscape w adverse real world consequences. Moral leadership in giving up that game should count, even w little engagement at first. It's not for everyone ofc.
@misc anecdotally, twitter was too "loud" & crowded for me to meaningfully engage with the space
i've found conversations on the fediverse to be of higher quality since switching.
Steve Herman (@w7voa) in July posted comparisons of 1 post:
"Interesting comparisons for the nearly identical posts I made earlier today about the death of Kevin Mitnick:"
Facebook: (4.5k followers) - 1 comment, 6 likes
Mastodon: (47k followers) - 42 boosts, 49 likes
Post.news (5.2k followers) - no engagement
Threads (<500 followers) - 2 likes
Twitter: (114.2k followers) - 7 retweets, 3 likes
https://mastodon.social/@w7voa@journa.host/110748637457487061
@misc It appears that without the algruthm and some huge and/or paid accounts swamoping the timeline, the signal to noise ratio is much much lower, so messages are actually getting through.
Also big up the auto hastag follow and the groups features for targetting viewers.
My #TrollLife on that site was pretty straightforward;
Create an account with a random historical name (I did many of the #Wallachian kings for instance)
Search for terms such as #Patriot #Abortion and #Trump and friend every horrible person I found
Agree with literally horrible points of view for a few days - typically a week generated a few thousand followers
Be honest, kind and open minded until the first death threat
Change password to a random string
Repeat.
@misc fursuiters I photographed at furry conventions appear to still prefer X, with some moving to Bluesky; only a few are on ActivityPub-based communities. I could count the spreadsheet later for anecdata.
Among furries in general, there are enough Fedi users at Furfest to half-fill a conference room for the Furry Fediverse panel.
@misc identical threads posted yesterday to X and Mastodon, much higher engagement on here. On X I have ~8500 followers, Mastodon ~2700.
In the time I've been cross-posting, sometimes something will do better on one place than the other and it's hard to predict what and why, but definitely I've had really good engagement on here!
@misc
Here you go. As you can see from my profile, I joined almost exactly a year ago, on Dec 15. My engagement/streams on Bandcamp started climbing almost immediately, and continued. Last year I had just shy of 3k streams. This year, I'm on track to have just under 9k for the year.
Sales also increased by roughly the same amount. My following here is similar size to my Twitter following (which I no longer use) but it took me a few months to get there once I arrived here.
@misc It's a counter point, but I still see significantly more discovery on twitter than on masto.
number of discussions is probably ~2x on twitter, but in depth discussions (say more than 2 back and fourths) is typically higher on masto.
The weird part is that a *lot* of "longer" masto discussions will suddently change into DM/mentioned only chains at the drop of a hat.
I want to say somewhere between 10 and 20% of all my posts on masto are mentioned only DMs mid conversation
@misc anecdata:
@AuthorHelp had several hundred followers on the birdsite, but rarely got more than a handful of retweets and comments.
We've been here a year and have successfully run the first #FediBookFair with a couple of hundred people engaging.