An add-on post to the prior one about the Netherlands, to clear up some common misunderstandings about my opinion:
1. I'm an anarchist. I'm not mourning the death of social democracy or any other state form.
2. People are pointing out that the Netherlands election does not give the right wing absolute power: they have to form a majority. OK. Trump did not get absolute power when he won the US Presidency either. In the US there is a complex system of checks and balances that is supposed to substitute for the party-majority system. Of course neither system works once the right gains enough popularity.
3. Neoliberalism is a form of liberalism. It's OK to refer to "right wing neoliberalism" if you consider the US center-left to be right wing. But neoliberalism's position in history is well understood and it is a natural outgrowth of liberalism as such.
4. Because of capitalist class interest, neoliberalism was a world order that had essentially no popular support. No one went around holding signs that said "Support the WTO and we all get wealthier". Where it had to, neoliberalism pretended to social progressivism, but it absolutely consolidated the destruction of anything to the left of itself. Even supposedly Communist China is effectively neoliberal, at least in how it relates to the rest of the world.
might also want to look at the issues they ran on etc.
@spacehobo I don't know the Dutch right-wing parties, but in Sweden the traditional right bloc hemmed and hawed for one election cycle while traditional left and right blocs jockeyed for minority power and in the next the traditional right bloc welcomed the fascists for a solid parliamental majority.
@spacehobo @RichPuchalsky @Hex »the plurality-take-all systems like Weimar«
What on earth are you talking about? The Weimar Republic Reichstag was elected by pure proportional representation
@georgepotter I'm disillusioned. The Right will collaborate. Even the so-called Liberal Right.
@clacke @RichPuchalsky I think they probably will, but that shouldn't be mistaken for being the same thing as the fascists "winning" an election when they still only represent a minority.
In the US a fascist won the 2016 presidential election. A fascist party winning a third of the seats in a parliamentary election is not the same thing, especially when we're talking about the benefits of proportional versus first past the post systems.
@georgepotter I'm a huge fan of proportional representation and I think first past the post sucks.
But the experience from the last ten years says that just like the center faction in the Republican Party caved to the fascist faction, so the center-right bloc in the multi-party Dutch system will cave to the largest party that is "at least not the Left", just like they did in Sweden. If not this time then next time, after a few years of parliamental uncertainty.
There will be a lot of symbolic resistance which in the end will amount to nothing, just like within the GOP in 2016.
Hitler's NSDAP had a third of the seats.
@georgepotter It did go faster to hijack the system in the US, I agree. But I think that the fascists becoming the biggest party is a Big Frikkin Deal to report on and the distinction whether "winning the election" means "literally won majority" or "the election was a huge win for them" is nitpicking.
They went from third party and declining to biggest party. That's a win, regardless if they can form a cabinet of their own. They're the kingmaker.
A majority of seats would have been a bigger disaster. But this is a big disaster and a huge disappointment.
@clacke @RichPuchalsky I don't think it's nitpicking, I think it's really important that we don't misrepresent election outcomes. Countries with first past the post assume that every election must have a "winner".
But the reality is not that the Dutch fascists have massively surged in popularity (though their popularity has increased) but that the non-fascist vote is more fragmented than ever before due to the emergence of new parties.
@georgepotter I wish I could share your optimism and I hope you are right.
@clacke @RichPuchalsky relevant update on this, it looks like hopefully the line might be holding:
@georgepotter That's good to hear. Looking forward to being wrong, at least this time around.
@georgepotter To me this says the fascists doubled their own seats plus won half of the incumbents' seats as supporters.
@georgepotter They more than doubled their vote and they almost doubled their seats. And a quarter of the voters is a terrifying amount of support for what should be a fringe party.
In terms of media strategy I agree that their victories should not be exaggerated as there's a risk that it becomes self-fulfilling and normalized. On the other hand their opposition needs a wake-up call, clearly.
@clacke @RichPuchalsky it is indeed scary, but just under 24% of the vote doesn't seem inconsistent with many countries, unfortunately. It should absolutely be a wake up call, and not just in the Netherlands.
However, the OP's point of "multi party systems let the fascists win too" is a great example of misrepresenting how popular fascists actually are and thereby giving them the legitimacy of success, which is often what encourages other parties to start working with them.
@RichPuchalsky
PVV is economically left-wing (higher minimum-wage, better services for handicapped people) and socially right-wing (anti-immigration, anti-woke).
Having so many parties means that opinions that get folded together in 2-party systems do not always go together in the Netherlands.
The largest international fearmonger about the PVV is D66 which is economically right-wing (protecting landlords) and socially left-wing (lots of rainbow flags, pro-euthanasia, pro-drugs)
@RichPuchalsky it‘s a worldwide failure of electoral democracy, that leads to partisanship, polarization, populism and extremism.
Another democratic future is possible.
That's part of neoliberalism, so it's the same thing.
"Consider for a second the moral assumptions inherent to a political philosophy that insists on voting for genocidaires rather than making genocidaires accountable to their victims. "
https://stevesalaita.com/genocide-joe-and-the-electoralists/
(Edited to add: this is written about Joe Biden, but it is really true of every US President)