It’s not a matter of whether someone is lying about their experience as a UFO witness, an intelligence officer, or other instances of grand assertions. The issue is always presenting conclusive evidence in proportion to the claim, particularly if trying to shift a cultural paradigm. Trust should not factor. Reasonable, sincere people do not expect others to embrace their claims absent proof. It is unreasonable to do so. #UFO #UAP #science #research
@jackbrewer
Exactly. Which is why I never filed formal reports. I can't prove anything about my odd experiences. People who know me well know I am being truthful about my experience, but that's as far as it goes. What I experienced is what I alone experienced. And I don't expect any more in terms of 'validation' from others (although I have had a few shared experiences.) The best I can hope for is that science will come into play and be able to explain it (REALLY explain it) in the future.The thing with Grusch was nuts, proved nothing, and was actually hearsay...which helped no one. The pilots were actual witnesses, but no one remembers their names. I'm sure that's the way former intelligence director, James Clapper (who was right behind Grusch at the hearing) wanted it. I designed this graphic a couple of years ago...It's my best sense of it...And no conclusions.