"Four Corners asked the NSW regulator how many safety breaches there have been at Snowy 2.0.

"It refused to provide the numbers, saying it may affect the contractor's reputation."

It *should* affect their reputation. One of those breaches was a tunnel full of isocyanate - "it's just water vapor," they said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-23/snowy-hydro-sinkhole-toxic-gas-tunnelling-four-corners/102995568

#australia #snowy2 #auspol

A sinkhole, toxic gas and the $2 billion mistake behind Snowy 2.0's blowout

Snowy Hydro's tunnelling machine caused a sinkhole and spent months barely moving, then the troubled project's tunnel began filling with gas.

ABC News
@winterknell the union would likely know.
@Moodre The important point here is the reason given for the refusal. There will be stuffups in any big project, but if workers were endangered the company concerned should not be given a pass on reputation damage.
@winterknell 100% agree - especially for a govt contract.
@winterknell The taxpayers would like a refund on the $2billion. What a fucking debacle. I bet the prick that authorised the fuckup got a promotion too.