I bloody hope this one is really a figure of speech!!!
@Lily_and_frog @resera @Chrishallbeck I presume you're thinking it's a figure of speech in the sense of it being about a song you can hear in your head without needing to actually hear it in the physical world. Well, that's real to me.
And not in the Animorphs sense, because that is in fact not...well, sometimes there are spiders in real life in ears. So earworms *could* be a thing, but...not a common occurrence.
@justpeachy @Chrishallbeck
Not a dumb question, I have the same, and I only started thinking about it when I realised I have aphantasia and what it means to have aphantasia.
I hear my own voice. But it's not my voice, because it "sounds" different. I read somewhere that it is called "milk voice", a mirky opaque solution. And it's not really a voice.
@freestyle @Chrishallbeck
By thinking. I don't need images to calculate the square root of 780.
I am not sure how people with a mind's eye would do it, do they see the number 780 and a square root sign and a calculator that actually does the calculating work for them?
@WGAvanDijk @Chrishallbeck would be cool but no.
I meant more as in carrying numbers over or when building more complex equations where it helps me too see the numbers i would need to write down.
@Chrishallbeck Ah... Aphantasia... how I loathe thee...
And yeah... this makes me feel seen...
... PUN INTENDED *stands behind the pun challenging anyone to attack it*
I have met someone who could not do images or inner voice. Other than that they seemed ok, even though I thought they may have been an android or alien.
I wonder if aphantastic people are more prone to be extraverted? And likewise introverted people can do the picture-thing?
@Sibshops @Chrishallbeck This debate does frequently have a bit of this feel to it:
@Chrishallbeck I'm not sure if what I have is aphastasia or not. But the visual part of my imagination doesn't overlap with my visual field, ever. But, I can "see" realistic things, just not "on the table" or "in the circle".
The voice in my head when I'm talking to myself or "reciting" something does have a "sound", but it doesn't sound like any voice (mine or others) coming from headphones, or my own including bone conduction.
@Chrishallbeck Wait, imagining an apple isn’t supposed to take effort? For me I have to think for a while to try to remember exactly what an apple is shaped like. The only vivid sensation I can easily imagine with an apple is what it feels like to hold one. For visuals, it’s like I’m remembering looking at one.
Is this not normal? Can most people literally *see* an apple when they close their eyes? This is so confusing and I can’t figure out if I can form mental images or not.
@fritzoids Yeah! I can imagine how heavy it is, how cold it is, how smooth the surface feels. I can imagine running my thumb over it and having it feel slightly sticky because of how the surface is sleek but still has friction. I can imagine biting into it and feeling the peel give way to the crisp interior, and feeling the acidity of the sticky juice.
Sight, smell, and sound give me basically nothing. But touch is vivid.
@Chrishallbeck when i was younger, I read pages of a book in seconds. I could take a snapshot of the page and read it later.
If I lost something, I could rewind my day and see where I put it.
A certain medicine damaged this and two things.
1 I had to learn how to memorise stuff - jeez it's hard rebuilding short term memory.
2 I realised not everyone could remember it all or rewind the day.
Until then I thought many others were lazy or slow
@Chrishallbeck I’m still not entirely convinced that anyone actually just “sees” or “hears” things in their mind. Like… how then do they make connections between concepts? Don’t they find it distracting when they’re trying to think? Does anything they visualise _mean_ anything to them?
I mean… I can see that people with hyperphantasia operate perfectly well in the world, I just don’t get how it works.
@Chrishallbeck Kind of, yeah. It seems like visualising objects would entail keeping track of a lot of extraneous specific detail that would get in the way of understanding the concepts.
The best way I can relate to it is that I see things, reduce them to a network of concepts and store those. Other people tell me they store entire unprocessed images and reduce them to concepts every time they recall them. That seems like a lot of work!