Synapse42
TheZoq2STOP DOING ML
PhilmacFLy@thezoq2
Same goes for cats btw
@angbor3d
Angbor@PhilmacFLy @thezoq2 More cuddly animals, less AI. 🤘
EricOutput is mostly 💩: ✔️ ✔️
Complexity of systems 🏳️⚧️@thezoq2 you should probably add an additional row for "can kill you" filled in with a orange background white circle (sorry couldn't find the actual Unicode symbol) with an asterisk next to it to denote only on the specific circumstances (i.e Killer Rabbit of Caerbannog, self-driving car)
xs4me2
gavinisdie 
@thezoq2 oh, also Bunnies are sentient unlike AI
AndrewC (migrating to ohai)@thezoq2 can you edit this to add an alt text please, so that screen reader folks can enjoy it too? #Alt4You Feel free to use this one!
Table comparing a bunny and a machine learning algorithm, captioned with "Stop Doing ML". They mostly tick the same boxes:
Hard to train.
Dubious output from good input.
Why is is so fuzzy?
Can be quite fast.
Entertaining when not destructive.
Likes to keep things hidden.
They differ on the last item, though:
Cute and cuddly (only the bunny)
@achadwick oh oops, someone else gave me a caption but I forgot to save the edit
@thezoq2 ah, I didn't see, such are the effervescent wonders of fedi post replication (toots are a froth)
Thanks!
Bart Champagne ON6BC 
@baardvrouw : this you ? 🙂
Shannon Quinn 
@thezoq2 As a bunny owner and an ML researcher… this is all true.
I don’t know why I do both when I could *just* be a bunny owner.
Jeroen Baert
Dr. Koala
BobertHepker@kali:~$ 
Josh Soref
ʙᴇɴ ᴄᴏᴛᴛᴇяɪʟʟ
bison ✅
Medea Vanamonde🏳️⚧️ ♀
Cenobyte 
@MishaVanMollusq @thezoq2 Funny, that's Cujo up there.
rrb@thezoq2 You forgot "Easy to sell to gullible billionaires for $$$$$$"
Dgar@thezoq2 START DOING BUNNIES
Aleksei � Matiushkin
hedwyg
lmaodoxr
April King@thezoq2 bunnies are actually quite easy to potty train, much easier than LLMs 😅
Pulp Tickertape@thezoq2 The rabbit is tastier too.
ÁngelEdible with vegetables and rice | ✅ | ❌
synlogic@thezoq2 I think ChatGPT was the 1st time I thought for real we could head down the path towards an AI Apocalypse
not because it will lead to a race of evil geniuses. but because (1) it could potentially put millions if not billion out of work, and (2) massively increase carbon and heat emissions -- all for deliveting results about comparable to what a human could do, already. however imperfect or wrong at times. heck humans are imperfect or wrong at times
Moved to @@thezoq2 Shits everywhere if the input is faulty: ✅ ✅
varelse@thezoq2 And imagine an Easter machine learning algorithm instead of an Easter bunny.
Kája@thezoq2 often involves measuring flops