That "smart lighting" from Philips is about to spy on you in new ways you can't control -- naturally the company is claiming it's to protect you. This is Trump-level lying.

https://www.home-assistant.io/blog/2023/09/22/philips-hue-force-users-upload-data-to-cloud/

[Update Oct 2: data sharing to become optional] Philips Hue will force users to upload their data to Hue cloud

To control your lights you soon need to create an account and share your data with the Hue cloud.

Home Assistant
@dangillmor @rewarp AKA business as usual in surveillance capitalism.
@dangillmor I’m very happy not having any so-called “smart” bulbs in my house.
@dangillmor as someone who has never used a hue product and has no knowledge of how you set them up ect, I'm confused about what data they can actually gather from lights. I don't understand what the lights in your house would give away in terms of sensitive information?

@spamboxer @dangillmor

At a minimum your location when you access the app to manipulate lights

@joeinwynnewood @spamboxer @dangillmor
So they’ll know I turned off the light from Chicago? They gonna break in my house or something?
@spamboxer @dangillmor Good question. Don’t think of them as lights, but as a small computer in your home (for tech folks: a Linux computer behind your firewall). Besides the obvious stuff geo location, habits, etc., they can pull information from traffic on your network - other devices (eg how many people in the house have iPhones, Roku boxes in the house, printers), and even sniff out sites you are visiting.
@aralqprf thanks for the reply and the knowledge 

@spamboxer @dangillmor

If you have the app on your phone, all the data from your phone pretty much. Browser history, apps downloaded, message content....lots of stuff in there to mine.

@artisanrox @dangillmor this sounds completely misleading unless the phone app requests all these permissions in order to run which I've seen mentioned nowhere.

@spamboxer @dangillmor

Feit electric:

Allow the following permissions: Location, Camera, Microphone, and Storage.

For Android 11, the permissions for Camera, Microphone, and Location must be set to "Only While App is in use". For Storage or Files & Media, permission must be set to "Allow all Files".

@artisanrox @spamboxer @dangillmor what kind of toxic hellstew phone do you have?

@aardvark @spamboxer @dangillmor

Why does it matter what phone I have when it's the APP that wants these permissions?

@artisanrox @spamboxer @dangillmor only a janky phone hands over browser history to an app just because it’s installed

@aardvark @spamboxer @dangillmor

janky applications like permission for your whole phone though if you haven't noticed

@artisanrox @spamboxer @dangillmor maybe I misunderstood what you said. Sounded like having the app installed let it mine your entire phone. It won’t have more permissions than you give it.

Further, some OSes take steps to limit the data mining. Eg https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=av1nevon

What’s new in privacy on the App Store - Latest News - Apple Developer

At Apple, we believe privacy is a fundamental human right. That is why we’ve built a number of features to help users understand developers’ privacy and data collection and sharing practices, and put users in the driver’s seat when it comes to their data. App Tracking Transparency (ATT) empowers users to choose whether an app has permission to track their activity across other companies’ apps and websites for the purposes of advertising or sharing with data brokers. With Privacy Nutrition Labels and App Privacy Report, users can see what data an app collects and how it’s used.Many apps leverage third-party software development kits (SDKs), which can offer great functionality but may have implications on how the apps handle user data. To make it even easier for developers to create great apps while informing users and respecting their choices about how their data is used, we’re introducing two new features.First, to help developers understand how third-party SDKs use data, we’re introducing new privacy manifests — files that outline the privacy practices of the third-party code in an app, in a single standard format. When developers prepare to distribute their app, Xcode will combine the privacy manifests across all the third-party SDKs that a developer is using into a single, easy-to-use report. With one comprehensive report that summarizes all the third-party SDKs found in an app, it will be even easier for developers to create more accurate Privacy Nutrition Labels.Additionally, to offer additional privacy protection for users, apps referencing APIs that could potentially be used for fingerprinting — a practice that is prohibited on the App Store — will now be required to select an allowed reason for usage of the API and declare that usage in the privacy manifest. As part of this process, apps must accurately describe their usage of these APIs, and may only use the APIs for the reasons described in their privacy manifest.Second, we want to help developers improve the integrity of their software supply chain. When using third-party SDKs, it can be hard for developers to know the code that they downloaded was written by the developer that they expect. To address that, we’re introducing signatures for SDKs so that when a developer adopts a new version of a third-party SDK in their app, Xcode will validate that it was signed by the same developer. Developers and users alike will benefit from this feature.We’ll publish additional information later this year, including: A list of privacy-impacting SDKs (third-party SDKs that have particularly high impact on user privacy) A list of “required reason” APIs for which an allowed reason must be declared A developer feedback form to suggest new reasons for calling covered APIs Additional documentation on the benefits of and details about signatures, privacy manifests, and when they will be required

@aardvark @spamboxer @dangillmor

>some OSes take steps to limit the data mining.

suuuuure they do

@spamboxer @dangillmor

location data. number of rooms. number of lights per room. usage patterns. patterns of when you are at home and when you are away. possibly even tv-shows you watch if you use their behind-the-tv interactive lighting products.

think that is enough? nope, not for Hue. their privacy policy says they will try to get more information about you from social media and attach that to your account.

@dangillmor @fj It’s a whole life of “Ok, so I can trust at least this company. They make money selling expensive quality lightbulb and oh fuck, even them.”

It really annoyed me because of all the toys in my smart home this was one of the most reliable (just behind the ones that were handmade with ESPHOME).

@dangillmor

In fact it is no longer Philips owned. The company spun off and is called Signify…

@dangillmor A good workaround is to not buy this stuff
@dangillmor So now, even the f’g lightbulbs will be collecting, sharing/selling/storing our data? And we laughed when Kellyanne said that the microwave was spying on her!
@dangillmor I like gadgets generally, but I won’t let in “smart” electronics into the home, and I don’t want “personal assistants” who are always-on corporate data collectors in my home either. Maybe it’s a lost battle, but one has to draw a line somewhere.
@dangillmor can't even access Phillips site unless I accept all their cookies!

@dangillmor I really struggle to understand the upside of smart lighting. Just flipping a switch to turn a light on or off suits my needs just fine.

I understand that other people might have different needs, but I've never heard anyone express any needs that would be met by smart lighting and not by dumb lighting.

@jozeldenrust @dangillmor bought those in combination with their light switches to retrofit additional switches in a very old flat without having to redraw all the electricity. Before we were stumbling through the dark at night to reach switches. But, yeah, a lot of it is just playing around...

@jozeldenrust

Jaap, I'm disabled. getting around to all the light switches can be difficult, if not sometimes impossible. Other people appreciate the idea of scenes of lights. Many reasons to have something better than just physical switches.

@rocketdyke yeah, the utility for disabled people is obvious, and I probably should have mentioned that in my original comment. I do think most of that utility can be achieved without these systems being online.

That's the part I don't understand: why does it have to be online? Traditional switches and dimmers do the job. If using those doesn't work, you could have WiFi controls confined to the local network.

People are giving up so much of their privacy.

@jozeldenrust exactly this. there is no need for online. that is why I'm removing hue from my house. I use homeassistant, so that remains offline if I want.
@dangillmor thanks for highlighting. Have quite a few of their lightbulbs. Looks like an alternative might be in order.

@dangillmor "When asked what drove this change, the answer is the usual: security. Well Signify, you know what keeps user data even more secure? Not uploading it all to your cloud."

You know what makes your data more secure than storing it on your computer? Storing on ours! Haha!

@briankrebs Forcing sign-in allows for admins and users to be defined. Before, _everybody_ was an admin. (And there are plenty of situations in which that's not a great idea.)
@5ean5ullivan @briankrebs probably, but why not allowing local accounts and forcing everyone to a cloud account instead?

@dunkelstern @briankrebs I don't use "smart" Hue features. I just adjust the color/brightness of my lights during the winter months (in Helsinki). So, I get wanting just a local account.

But bridges can also be used to control cameras and motion sensors. And kids can foul up lighting configurations. So there really needs to be a variety of permissions/roles available.

The only practical way to offer a just a local account, would be a local server. Not a bridge. And that just seems like a whole other can of worms.

In any case, like or not is a matter of opinion, but I respectfully disagree that Philips is "lying".

@5ean5ullivan @briankrebs i get that some features make more sense with a cloud server (how would remote access to a security camera work without jumping through many hoops, etc.) but for configuration local accounts on a bridge should be no problem. I don’t mind if i have the option to use a cloud account and loose some features if i do not want to. But forcing users of a previously local only system to get a cloud account and sync with that is just shitty.
@5ean5ullivan @briankrebs Which is fine but none of those scenarios applies to me so why should I have to?

@dangillmor Yeah, it’s asking me to accept their new TOS already to even open the app, no option to decline. Guess I’ll take them down.

Shame, they were cute.

@dangillmor if any smart device has to connect to the company server for anything, and/or needs an app... then I assume the security is non existent, or might as well be, and do not buy...
@dangillmor
got to be honest - I stopped trusting device apps about the same time mobile gaming began applying Room 101 mechanisms to anything to do with mobile.
@dangillmor Being a software engineer for a decade, I’ve never understood why most of my “smart home” devices cannot be controlled from my home. Even a Yeelight ceiling light stops responding to its own Bluetooth remote if you cut the internet connection.
@dangillmor
Well it's back to The Clapper for me.
Ich bin nicht sicher, ob das ein auf die USA begrenzter Skandal in Sachen #Privacy ist. Ich bin ziemlich sicher, dass das derzeit noch gegen europäisches Datenschutzrecht verstoßen würde.
https://www.home-assistant.io/blog/2023/09/22/philips-hue-force-users-upload-data-to-cloud/
[Update Oct 2: data sharing to become optional] Philips Hue will force users to upload their data to Hue cloud

To control your lights you soon need to create an account and share your data with the Hue cloud.

Home Assistant
@dangillmor Increasingly of the opinion that nothing should ever connect to the internet ever again.
@dangillmor I like how Trump is the standard for ridiculous, bald-faced lying...
@dangillmor Just fucking use normal light bulbs like every other normal person. It's not difficult to use the light switch on the wall near the door and it's very fast. 😂
@dangillmor
Looking at the comments, it seems there is a limited window of time to remove your bulbs from the hub with the app and connect them to a standard zigby controller. It seems that the app is required to unpair the bulb and that will require a login soon so now's the time if you want to keep your lightbulb metadata private.
@RnDanger @dangillmor You can reset the bulbs with a dimmer (i.e. like this https://hueblog.com/2022/01/05/resetting-philips-hue-lamps-with-the-new-dimmer-switch/), no need for the app.
Resetting Philips Hue lamps with the new dimmer switch - Hueblog.com

In the past few days I have sorted out some old lamps and sold them on eBay. Several buyers had no idea how to reset the lamps so that the new Bridge would find them immediately – although it is so easy with the dimmer switch. This is how easy it is to reset a…

Hueblog.com
@dangillmor
Philips is added to my "do not buy" list along with Samsung and Tesla.
@dangillmor DEFINITELY glad my Hue bridge stopped working and I migrated my Hue devices to Home Assistant, where everything else already was...
@dangillmor @briankrebs
Cheerio Philips & Signify & Hue, what a terrible decision… what a shame..
@dangillmor @hacks4pancakes
So glad I got an LIFX bulb, where even if their central service goes down*, I know the LAN protocol has been documented: https://lan.developer.lifx.com/docs
(* definitely possible as the company almost went under and got purchased last year)
Introduction

LIFX Devices use a binary messaging format to communicate with other devices on your network. This protocol uses UDP over IP and a packed binary encoding scheme. In this documentation we will explain how to structure LIFX packets, and the various behaviors associated with them.This documentation is ...

LIFX LAN Protocol
@dangillmor if they disable or degrade the usability of my Hue devices, I will seek compensation. If anyone wants to work together on this, lemme know.

@dangillmor this doesn’t differ from the level of spying from other companies like Go*gle, *mazon, Sams*ng, Apple even.

Once they learned they could make money off of your data and click patterns, they learn how to exploit it for profits while getting away with it.
I stopped using the Philips app when they kept asking me to reconnect my toothbrush so they could track how many brushes I had left from the brush itself. Yeah, I decide that, so pass. Thanks, but no, thanks.

@dangillmor @kf Thanks for sharing this, y’all. Longtime Hue user, very handy, dependable smart bulbs. Am not signed in b/c I control all of them via Apple Home (Apple’s many things, but I trust them more w/ privacy than Philips).

Will def. prod their support to not do this.

Navigating the CPRA’s “Do Not Sell or Share” requirement

On January 1, 2023, the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) will expand and amend several aspects of the CCPA, including consumer rights.