Child poverty in the United States just more than doubled. You can thank Joe Manchin.

https://lemmy.one/post/3816360

Child poverty in the United States just more than doubled. You can thank Joe Manchin. - Lemmy.one

The United States’ poverty rate experienced its largest one-year jump on record last year, with the rate among children more than doubling from 2021’s historic low of 5.2 percent to 12.4 percent according to new numbers from the US Census Bureau out today. They’re the latest data to reflect the devastating effects following the expiration of nearly all pandemic-era relief programs. That includes the end of Medicaid rules that protected recipients from getting kicked off because of administrative errors, an end to rental assistance policies, and the restart of student loan payments. These policies might seem like a distant memory at this point. But they’re worth recalling with the arrival of every new report. Each demonstrates what happens when politicians long hostile to caregivers, universal health care, and the welfare state, for a brief moment, acted to create powerful, federally-backed safety net programs aimed at helping everyday Americans. One of the most effective programs to emerge was the expansion of the child tax credit, which provided families monthly checks of up to $300 per child and broadened eligibility rules for qualifying families. In turn, child poverty rates plummeted; the extra income allowed caregivers to quit grueling second and third jobs; parents were able to buy their kids decent clothes and help stop taunting at school. The Census Bureau previously reported that food insecurity dropped dramatically after just the first extended payment, from 10.7 million households reporting they didn’t have enough food to 7.4 million. But as the pandemic receded, Republicans with the help of West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, who in private remarks reportedly warned that families were using the extra income to buy drugs, appeared to remember the country’s longstanding pre-pandemic hostility. Their opposition ultimately tanked President Biden’s agenda, and along with it, the brief life of the expanded child tax credit. That’s something worth remembering today as the predictable crowd is likely to cry about Democratic-engineered inflation.

it’s strange how ‘doubling child poverty’ is never on those big lists that redditors post whenever someone asks what joe biden’s done
Wow…your comment is so dumb I was literally left speeches for a while
Because of it’s truth?
Most definetly not lol. Because 1. You completely ignored the article and its main point 2. You showed how little you followed/understood of what happened in US politics for the past 3 years and 3. You keep doubling down in your own ignorance, like a proper fool is has no idea of what is going on and yet is dead convinced of his own…let’s call it “reasons”

Did Biden fight tooth and nail to push through his agenda? Nope.

So it’s completely reasonable to say that Biden allowed childhood poverty to double under his watch.

See my points above lol they seem to fit you as well.

With the “majority” down to literally 2 people, enlighten me and everyone else: how should have things gone according to you? How would YOU have fought tooth and nail while not risking to lose any practical way to govern? I’ll wait

make those 2 people vote the way you want?
LMAO How?? You force them with a gun? Lol

Actually political parties can and should enforce political discipline on their members, and there should be reprisals for going against the party and its leadership.

But the reality is, letting Manchin trash this legislation is probably more the plan than an opposition to it

Ffs…HOW do you enforce discipline?? All these people replying to me say the same thing, but you all fail to give examples.

What, you’re going to torture him? Slap him? You think that will change his mind? Biden has nothing against him. If he tries anything, Manchin can simply become a Republican or independent and run on how he “blocked Bowen’s agenda” and lose the Democrats a seat

If they can’t control him then they’ve already functionally lost a seat (unless of course, they actually like having him block legislation they don’t actually want to pass)

Parties exert control on their members in this country, they always have, and generally not through violence or torture. Usually its through taking away party support from them and their personal agenda. It could be attacking political pork to West Virginia, close military or other government facilities there, and support challengers/kick him out of the party so he can’t run on their ticket. It could possibly include more strong-arm tactics, not violence, not even anything necessarily illegal, that’s speculative but possible.

What you’re asking people to explain, is something that is the norm. You’re the one actually making an outrageous claim of how do we expect a political party to control and discipline its members. And pretending that the Democratic Party or the President just have no power in this situation is ludicrous

If they can’t control him then they’ve already functionally lost a seat (unless of course, they actually like having him block legislation they don’t actually want to pass)

Except he still votes for federal judges and for the infrastructure bill. So the seat is definetly not being used how we’d like, but it’s not lost or we wouldn’t even have those.

Parties exert control on their members in this country, they always have, and generally not through violence or torture. Usually its through taking away party support from them and their personal agenda. It could be attacking political pork to West Virginia, close military or other government facilities there, and support challengers/kick him out of the party so he can’t run on their ticket. It could possibly include more strong-arm tactics, not violence, not even anything necessarily illegal, that’s speculative but possible.

Fair enough! You’re literally the first and only person who gave me a detailed and actual example of what could be done. My only comment is that sadly Manchin knows the amount of leverage he has, so until he’s not needed, he can always just block anything ever further. I hate too that we have a democracy that can be taken over by two greedy assholes and that places so much importance on judges, but until something is done to change that, we can only plan accordingly.

What you’re asking people to explain, is something that is the norm. You’re the one actually making an outrageous claim of how do we expect a political party to control and discipline its members? And pretending that the Democratic Party or the President just have no power in this situation is ludicrous

If you read through the replies I’ve received, you’ll quickly realize it’s not that outrageous since most were just saying “you use violence” and failed to give answers. Please, don’t put words I didn’t say in my mouth. I’ve never said the president or the party have no power. The do have it. But it’s undeniable that Manchin (and Sinema) for some twisted, sick fate they have it too. And at the moment we have a slighty centre, centre right president who’s not willing to go above and beyond to push back because he prefers getting by with what he has. Do I like it? Fuck. No. Do I see any other alternative in the current political climate until next elections? Sadly no.

I don’t think elections hold a lot of promise of fixing anything. I think Manchin and Sinema are exactly where their party wants them. I don’t think that this legislation failing is something that the Biden Admin or the DNC are against.

I think they’re happy about it, and thats why there’s no discipline exerted on either of them. That’s what i meant by you making an extraordinary claim about party discipline. Theres no party discilple or reprisals because the party doesn’t care about this legislation. They like having these scapegoats. The Democratic Party leadership does not share your view, that these people shouldn’t be there. That’s why elections in this system will not fix it