@cypnk @richaesthetic @BasicAppleGuy Living in Brazil, the thought of people living in shelters AND using Apple products at the same time is extremely wild.
(To be clear, I totally believe it's a realistic scenario in the US, as I am aware both that Apple's market share there is much higher than the world average and that the US has a growing inequality problem causing people to move down the social ladder rather quickly.)
It's true! I worked for years in a very impoverished community in the Boston area, and the iPhone was the phone of choice. It's the only computer most people there ever have, and it's much more reliable and much higher quality than Android.
Also, for a sense of scale, you can get an older iPhone from a local chain store, right now, for $250, while RentCafe.com reports the average monthly apartment rent in that very neighborhood is more than 10 times that.
@richaesthetic @BasicAppleGuy For any Android user switching to Apple, it reduces e-waste.
And for Apple users with USB-C chargers for a Mac and their iPad, they may not need yet another for their iPhone.
@SuperSluether thank you! This is my point exactly! Hopefully others can see this isn’t an Android vs iOS thing!
By the way, what’s your take on interoperability (whether forced or not) between platforms like iMessage and WhatsApp?
@richaesthetic I love interoperability, and I think the fediverse is a great example of it. We all interact on a standard protocol, while some implementations have their own features or interface.
The parts I'm less sure on are how to maintain security, and deciding who gets to develop and use their own protocol. WhatsApp and iMessage are end-to-end encrypted. iMessage is proprietary while WhatsApp is based on the Signal protocol. I'm not sure how you interop between protocols. Without being forced, would it be like iMessage/SMS on the iPhone now (if it happens at all)? If it does get forced, where would the line get drawn? (Thinking Snapchat, Discord, Teams, or any other messaging app)
Signal and WhatsApp use the same protocol, but they are still built very differently and Signal makes very deliberate choices to avoid collecting user data on the server.
Maybe none of this even matters since Matrix already had interoperable E2E messaging.
(1/2)
@richaesthetic TL;DR, it sounds good on paper, but I also wouldn't want my data shared with WhatsApp just because the app I use can interop with them. Maybe that's a non-issue; I don't know enough about it to say for sure.
(2/2)
@richaesthetic It could be worth pre-emptively rotating to a newer cable, as an older cable could cause more wear on the phone’s charging port, and cables are a lot cheaper to replace than the charging port. I learned that the hard way after replacing a micro-USB port on a phone.
To Apple’s credit, the simplicity of a Lightning port seems more durable than micro-USB ports and possible USB-C ports as well.
@luvadergolder @richaesthetic In my house we may have fewer lightning chargers than devices because they don’t all need to charge at the same time.
I don’t like keeping my phone at 100% for too long so I don’t use a bedside charger, for example. I charge in the morning or at work.
@richaesthetic @markstos I like the idea of having an opt-in on purchase. But as a tech reviewer your consumption of phones generally is going to be higher than need-based usage. The bigger issue is just how many phones we go through, period. Mine is from 2016, nearing end of life; I have had to purchase additional charging cables for my tablet because of that regrettable period when OEM cables had a tendency to melt (they've been better since.)
Donate, gift, freecycle, don't trash.