Kyle Rittenhouse is being sued by the estate of the mentally disturbed man Rittenhouse shot four times and killed.

Rittenhouse’s response:

“These lawsuits are making it harder and harder for me to move on with my life”

The amount of cope white men feel after doing something horrible could power a city

Do you know what else makes it hard to move on with your life?

Being murdered

@flexghost

If you kill a man, you should not be able to move on with your life, that is the whole point...

Unbelievable...

@xs4me2 @flexghost
Context matters. I don't think self-defense is the same as first or second degree murder. Is it legal to own a gun and use it for self-defense in the US? Yes. Was it self-defense against mortal injury? Yes. Do police do the same in the US? Yes. You just write and I quote "An eye for an eye...". I don't think you have the mental capacity to make a logical decision regarding this event or any loss of life event that includes someone taking a life. I do not support that person who carry automatic firearms in the middle of the road.Neither I also don't support his freedom being used for some people's political agenda.

@turretjust @flexghost

Look, Rittenhouse went out into the street with an AR15 during a civil unrest. He went looking for trouble, killed 2 persons and wounded another.

"An eye for an eye..." is a commandment found in the Book of Exodus 21:23–27 expressing the principle of reciprocal justice measure for measure.

Killing 2 persons and wounding another and then be acquitted is not justice.

Context matters.

@xs4me2 @flexghost What he did was self-defense and legal by US laws. As he found not guilty. You can find "An eye for an eye" in other historical vocabulary older than Jesus and bible. If your logic and ethics from 3500 Years ago and can't comprehend modern rehabilitation options and modern reasoning and ask for another human death, You should care about your compos mentis before questioning jurisdiction of a another man.

@turretjust @flexghost

Guess you should stick with sharing cat pictures or go to X (twitter).

Good luck with your assumptions!

@xs4me2 @flexghost I love cats. check my cat posts account but not consider my opinion on your biased lobbyists idea that you clearly not own.

Try to be happy by feeling included in life that ideology of others.

@turretjust @xs4me2

Wow.

AI almost sounds like humans. Almost.

@flexghost @xs4me2 Is this "I am human so I am right on my opinion cus I have them" moment? I am sorry to offend "I don't have personality other than US politics" person. I would not argue with people that don't have ethic and logic education anymore. Its totally problem of my end.@absolutejank, Go on agree with guy that ask for "eye for an eye" without knowing the meaning of it. Stay in bauble. such disdainfulness

@turretjust @flexghost @absolutejank

Goodbye ChatGPT instance ;)

@turretjust @flexghost @absolutejank

ChatGPT:

Engaging in productive and respectful conversations with others, even when you disagree, can be more constructive than dismissing their opinions outright. It's possible to share your perspective and knowledge in a way that promotes understanding and encourages open dialogue.

@turretjust @flexghost @absolutejank

ChatGPT:

Disagreements are natural, and it's okay to have strong opinions, but approaching conversations with empathy and patience can lead to more meaningful discussions and potential for learning on both sides.

@turretjust @flexghost

Great, then at least we have something in common (yuck).

Cannot make up my mind if you are a bot, a troll or just a MAGA adept...

What is your opinion on the Russian war of aggression?

@xs4me2 I do not live in US. I did not vote in US. I do not care about US politics unless it effects humankind and for the better good. I do not agree with you and I stated my opinion as a person that believes ethics and logic.
That is my right to do so. You might not agree with me and I am fine with not sharing same opinion.
What I am frustrated about is you using another human beings freedom as your political agenda without regarding logic of events. You could choose better events and people to support your opinion but you choose that one which is not smart. October 1, 2017 Las Vegas shooting and man carrying that much gun and more than 1000 bullets to hotel room might be better supporting event for your biased opinion.

@turretjust

Great response for a ChatGPT instance...

Need to talk more about your frustrations, as I have an idea there are many?

@xs4me2 If you think that those written by AI, I am pleased by it. I thank you as not regular writer other than code comments.
Have a beautiful morning/noon/night !

@turretjust @xs4me2 @flexghost That fact that a sympathetic jury found him not guilty does not change that he, got in a car driven by mommy with a semiautomatic weapon, drove across state lines to an active and potentially violent protest, acted in a threatening manner with that firearm, and then "had to defend himself" against trouble he incited.

I will not shed tear number one for this kid having to face civil liability for his actions.

@turretjust @xs4me2 @flexghost Went looking for trouble. Found it. Got scared by it. Started killing people.
@turretjust @xs4me2 @flexghost ... and the REASON for all this, is because he was a gullible, immature, young adult who had been poisoned by opportunistic populists telling him he was at war and had to fight for his freedom of lose it; and this gullible child had easy access to a weapon capable of firing as fast and often as he could pull the trigger.

@FirefighterGeek @turretjust @flexghost

True, and if the orange clown would ever be elected again, we will see more of this.

@FirefighterGeek I see your point. underage person manipulated by his family given an automatic rifle middle of unrest is not good parenting at all. But did it help Anti-gun populists more than it help trump supporter agenda? had congress ban the same weapon already? As a individual that not partaker of US voting system, I believe US don't have genuine democracy. Choosing between candidates which uses unconventional ways to get elected which is trump and incompetent easy to manipulate candidate that planted; must be really hard.

Would you think the people lead to this event more guilty than underage malleable person.
Your country politics only have extremist political opinions. only 2 parties, Too many vulnerable people without free-thinking ability, people seeking approval-seeking by absorbing political parties as personality. loss of individualism
You already live in dystopia. You ain't aware.

@turretjust ugh.
cc: @xs4me2 @flexghost

1. Nothing unconventional about Dolt45's nationalism and populism. It's been done a thousand times.

2. Same logic you used to defend the murderous child - the law says he's old enough to be responsible, so he's responsible.

3. IMCO, his mother should be criminally liable for her part in supplying transportation and firearms. That she isn't is a problem with the laws.

4. I don't need a sealion polluting my masto. Muting now, blocking later. Bye bye.

@FirefighterGeek @turretjust @xs4me2 @flexghost

He sure as hell would not be "getting on with his life" if he had been convicted of murder, nor would he be if one of the people he shot had decided to shitcan the chase and simply fire first. None of them did, and they all deserve credit for that. They had discipline and he did NOT.