flexghost.Aug 29, 2023

Kyle Rittenhouse is being sued by the estate of the mentally disturbed man Rittenhouse shot four times and killed.

Rittenhouse’s response:

“These lawsuits are making it harder and harder for me to move on with my life”

The amount of cope white men feel after doing something horrible could power a city

Do you know what else makes it hard to move on with your life?

Being murdered

Show threadxs4me2Aug 29, 2023

@flexghost

If you kill a man, you should not be able to move on with your life, that is the whole point...

Unbelievable...

Show threadturretjustAug 29, 2023
@xs4me2 @flexghost
Context matters. I don't think self-defense is the same as first or second degree murder. Is it legal to own a gun and use it for self-defense in the US? Yes. Was it self-defense against mortal injury? Yes. Do police do the same in the US? Yes. You just write and I quote "An eye for an eye...". I don't think you have the mental capacity to make a logical decision regarding this event or any loss of life event that includes someone taking a life. I do not support that person who carry automatic firearms in the middle of the road.Neither I also don't support his freedom being used for some people's political agenda.
Show threadxs4me2Aug 29, 2023

@turretjust @flexghost

Look, Rittenhouse went out into the street with an AR15 during a civil unrest. He went looking for trouble, killed 2 persons and wounded another.

"An eye for an eye..." is a commandment found in the Book of Exodus 21:23–27 expressing the principle of reciprocal justice measure for measure.

Killing 2 persons and wounding another and then be acquitted is not justice.

Context matters.

Show threadturretjustAug 29, 2023
@xs4me2 @flexghost What he did was self-defense and legal by US laws. As he found not guilty. You can find "An eye for an eye" in other historical vocabulary older than Jesus and bible. If your logic and ethics from 3500 Years ago and can't comprehend modern rehabilitation options and modern reasoning and ask for another human death, You should care about your compos mentis before questioning jurisdiction of a another man.
Show threadFirefighterGeek Aug 30, 2023
@turretjust @xs4me2 @flexghost ... and the REASON for all this, is because he was a gullible, immature, young adult who had been poisoned by opportunistic populists telling him he was at war and had to fight for his freedom of lose it; and this gullible child had easy access to a weapon capable of firing as fast and often as he could pull the trigger.
Show threadturretjust

@FirefighterGeek I see your point. underage person manipulated by his family given an automatic rifle middle of unrest is not good parenting at all. But did it help Anti-gun populists more than it help trump supporter agenda? had congress ban the same weapon already? As a individual that not partaker of US voting system, I believe US don't have genuine democracy. Choosing between candidates which uses unconventional ways to get elected which is trump and incompetent easy to manipulate candidate that planted; must be really hard.

Would you think the people lead to this event more guilty than underage malleable person.
Your country politics only have extremist political opinions. only 2 parties, Too many vulnerable people without free-thinking ability, people seeking approval-seeking by absorbing political parties as personality. loss of individualism
You already live in dystopia. You ain't aware.

Aug 30, 2023 at 8:28amWeb
Show threadFirefighterGeek Aug 30, 2023

@turretjust ugh.
cc: @xs4me2 @flexghost

1. Nothing unconventional about Dolt45's nationalism and populism. It's been done a thousand times.

2. Same logic you used to defend the murderous child - the law says he's old enough to be responsible, so he's responsible.

3. IMCO, his mother should be criminally liable for her part in supplying transportation and firearms. That she isn't is a problem with the laws.

4. I don't need a sealion polluting my masto. Muting now, blocking later. Bye bye.