Kyle Rittenhouse is being sued by the estate of the mentally disturbed man Rittenhouse shot four times and killed.

Rittenhouse’s response:

“These lawsuits are making it harder and harder for me to move on with my life”

The amount of cope white men feel after doing something horrible could power a city

Do you know what else makes it hard to move on with your life?

Being murdered

@flexghost

If you kill a man, you should not be able to move on with your life, that is the whole point...

Unbelievable...

@xs4me2 @flexghost
Context matters. I don't think self-defense is the same as first or second degree murder. Is it legal to own a gun and use it for self-defense in the US? Yes. Was it self-defense against mortal injury? Yes. Do police do the same in the US? Yes. You just write and I quote "An eye for an eye...". I don't think you have the mental capacity to make a logical decision regarding this event or any loss of life event that includes someone taking a life. I do not support that person who carry automatic firearms in the middle of the road.Neither I also don't support his freedom being used for some people's political agenda.

@turretjust @flexghost

Look, Rittenhouse went out into the street with an AR15 during a civil unrest. He went looking for trouble, killed 2 persons and wounded another.

"An eye for an eye..." is a commandment found in the Book of Exodus 21:23–27 expressing the principle of reciprocal justice measure for measure.

Killing 2 persons and wounding another and then be acquitted is not justice.

Context matters.

@xs4me2 @flexghost What he did was self-defense and legal by US laws. As he found not guilty. You can find "An eye for an eye" in other historical vocabulary older than Jesus and bible. If your logic and ethics from 3500 Years ago and can't comprehend modern rehabilitation options and modern reasoning and ask for another human death, You should care about your compos mentis before questioning jurisdiction of a another man.

@turretjust @flexghost

Guess you should stick with sharing cat pictures or go to X (twitter).

Good luck with your assumptions!

@xs4me2 @flexghost I love cats. check my cat posts account but not consider my opinion on your biased lobbyists idea that you clearly not own.

Try to be happy by feeling included in life that ideology of others.

@turretjust @xs4me2

Wow.

AI almost sounds like humans. Almost.

@flexghost @xs4me2 Is this "I am human so I am right on my opinion cus I have them" moment? I am sorry to offend "I don't have personality other than US politics" person. I would not argue with people that don't have ethic and logic education anymore. Its totally problem of my end.@absolutejank, Go on agree with guy that ask for "eye for an eye" without knowing the meaning of it. Stay in bauble. such disdainfulness

@turretjust @flexghost @absolutejank

ChatGPT:

Engaging in productive and respectful conversations with others, even when you disagree, can be more constructive than dismissing their opinions outright. It's possible to share your perspective and knowledge in a way that promotes understanding and encourages open dialogue.

@turretjust @flexghost @absolutejank

ChatGPT:

Disagreements are natural, and it's okay to have strong opinions, but approaching conversations with empathy and patience can lead to more meaningful discussions and potential for learning on both sides.