In an interview, Zelenskyy said Ukraine would lose its allies, if #Ukraine moved the war to Russia.

In essence, western politicians have created a fight, where Putin can kill everyone and destroy everything anywhere in Ukraine, and when it suits him, he can pull his troops back to Russia for a breather, before they return to rape and plunder some more.

This is what fear has done to the west: We have now accepted the rules set by a war criminal.

This is wrong.

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/08/27/7417318/index.amp

Zelenskyy on war on Russia's territory: It carries a big risk that we will be left alone

Ukrainska Pravda
@randahl @joshbuchea The solution was to take out Putin 30 years ago. The next best option is wholesale regime change, today. Dismantle it and rebuild. It’s not a real government anyway.

@jsj @randahl @joshbuchea
We already did regime change in Russia.
The West called it Shock Therapy, and that's what created to opportunities for Putin to rise to power.

Why would we think another regime change by the West would improve anything? Take a look at Iran, Iraq, & Afghanistan for recent examples.

@Jeramee @randahl @joshbuchea I don’t think it will “improve” anything. It **will** change things. We’ve lived in a stalemate for three decades. If we can’t meaningfully “improve” the situation, and the status quo results in *gestures at everything* the next best thing is to force change.

And comparing Russia to Iraq or Afghanistan is like comparing a praying mantis to a red balloon. They both exist on earth, but that’s about as much as they have in common.

@jsj @randahl @joshbuchea

You forgot Iran with Iraq, Afghanistan, & Russia. And I'll spell it out for you: all 4 countries underwent regime changes because of US machinations, and all 4 are objectively worse off after the regime change.

So, your solution is continued US machinations and assassination?

If we want to improve anything at all, my country needs to change first.

Btw, when your solution is to advocate murder, you've lost.

@Jeramee The problem with each of those cases is we didn't finish the job. US official policy is that we don't conquer anymore. We're not taking over countries any longer, officially. So we have to install people, and they eventually fuck us over. That's where we screw up. We never finish the job. And we're never willing to commit what it'll take to finish the job. Even if we were willing to pay the monetary costs, the bleeding hearts would bitch and moan about a million other excuses.

And sentences like "when your solution is to ... you've lost" only show a lack of experience and/or historical knowledge, truly. Lost what, exactly? What rules are you playing by? They're certainly not the rules people like Putin are playing by. Try explaining those rules to the many people who've fallen off balconies or flown through windows or whose planes fell out of the sky.

@jsj

No, the problem was that there was no legitimate reason to attack to begin with.

Kermit Roosevelt committed literal terrorism in Iran.

The Afghanistan & Iraq wars were based on outright lies.

And the US meddled in Russia since before the USSR was formed, and its formation was a direct response to security concerns from US aggression.

Finish the job? How? How many millions more people are you willing to murder to "finish the job?"

@jsj

300,000 civilian deaths from the second Iraq wars alone. That war was predicated on outright lies. That makes it a crime of aggression - a literal war crime.

How many more dead civilians are you willing to kill to "finish the job"?

https://www.iraqbodycount.org/

Iraq Body Count

@Jeramee Give it up. You’re not convincing me.

@jsj

You're literally simping imperialism, then, when presented with the consequences of it, just sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming lalalala....