In “Petro-masculinity: Fossil Fuels and Authoritarian Desire” (2018), Cara Daggett explains why, with white men, #climate denial and #misogyny so often go together.

She makes a powerful argument that the patriarchal power structures in our society are deeply entwined with our fossil-fuel based economy.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0305829818775817

SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class research journals

Subscription and open access journals from SAGE Publishing, the world's leading independent academic publisher.

@slothrop

This is a well written and thoughtful article, that touches on a key point that other articles like this miss: It points out that "masculinity" as defined here, means "white masculinity,"

Non-white men are *more* likely to be alarmed about climate change than white women. 🙂🙃

In fact, non-white boomers and silent generation, are more concerned about climate change than white Gen-Z women. 🤦🏿‍♂️

So the primary driver of this climate denial is unlikely to be masculinity in general.

@mekkaokereke I’ve become more convinced that there is a stronger correlation between climate denialism or indifference and someone’s dependence or perceived dependence on cars.

So many people believe they need cars, that no matter the threat of climate issues that stem from them, they will fight for more parking, wider highways, faster speed limits.

#carculture has ruined our planet.

This is the linchpin for us in the U.S. Do you believe in #climatechange enough to stop driving for the majority of your errands? Do you believe enough to call and write you city council to demand that they stop putting car travel above all other means? Do you believe enough to join the #waroncars? It’s not enough to just say it’s real, we all need to act. We all need to choose not to drive even if it is less convenient. Help get protected bike lanes in your city, more transit, safer walking!
@bluejekyll Never happen. But, not giving up. Note: The most effective weapon in the war on smoking was driving the cost of tobacco up and up and up relentlessly. Not all the this-will-kill-you warnings. Discouraging cars is futile without massive public-transit investment. People got to get places. So, punitive taxation plus huge investment.

@timbray @bluejekyll hard agree with Tim. Convincing governments to stop subsidizing fossil fuels (in whatever form) is one of the things that's going to move the needle.

Convincing people to be "inconvenienced" is a non starter and we already know how to generate enough electricity without fossil fuels.

We can have the future we want from a position of abundance, not scarcity (a la _Electrify_ by Saul Griffith).

@davemangot @timbray it sounds like you might be suggesting that EVs are the path to the future. And if that’s via bikes, maybe. But in terms of cars it will be 15 years or more before we make a significant dent in ICE vehicles, which is why we need to move away from cars urgently.

100% agree that fuel needs to be priced at its real cost to society.

@bluejekyll @timbray the 3 biggest choices you can make are:

* transportation
* heating
* cooking

It will be never years before we convince enough people to give something up to save the planet. Scarcity is not a winning hand.

Thankfully electric motors are just better. EVs are just one piece of the puzzle. When I cook away from my induction, gas feels positively archaic. #stopburningstuff

The other big levers are not personal choices for better or for worse.

@timbray I think you’re pragmatically correct, but I will say a reason I choose to ride at this point isn’t because of the environment or any other saintly reason. I just enjoy biking for my errands more. It’s far more enjoyable than being in a car.
@bluejekyll Totally, I have an e-bike and it's a life-changer. Also, wherever you go, free parking right in front.
@timbray @bluejekyll but to your original point, most cities need to invest massively before people will do this en masse. I’d love to ride an e-bike everywhere, but it’s insanely dangerous in SF.

@pmorelli @timbray as someone who bikes around SF (without an assist) for 19 years with and without kids on the back, I gotta say SF has never been safer for cycling than it is today. All the slow street improvements are amazing as well.

That said, there are huge areas that can still be better. This is partly what I’m pointing out, a lot of people fight these improvements in their cities and then folks won’t choose to ride because it feels unsafe to do so.

@timbray @bluejekyll there are so many places with good transit and bike already. But we just subsidize cars so much. I think we're way closer to a tipping point than many think, especially given widespread municipal insolvency. All the reason to push harder.