In 1995, 14 wolves were released in Yellowstone National Park.

No one expected the miracle that the wolves would bring.

It started with the wolves hunting the deer, this led to a rapid decrease in the deer population. The wolves' presence also made the deer avoid parts in the park where they were and easy prey.

Thanks to the deer's absence, those parts started to regenerate. Forests of aspen and willow trees started to flourish.

That's when things really started to happen. With trees and bushes came more berries and bugs. As soon as that happened, various bird species started moving in.

With the increasing tree population, also another species was attracted. The beaver, previously extinct in the region, moved back. And the dams they built provided habitats for otters, muskrats and reptiles.

The wolves also killed coyotes, which meant more hawks, red foxes, badgers and weasels in the park. Even the population of bald eagles and ravens rose.

But here's where it gets really interesting. The wolves changed the behavior of the rivers. With more balance between predator and prey came the possibility for other species to thrive. There was less erosion because of increased vegetation. And the river banks were stabilized, the channels narrowed, more pools formed, and the rivers stayed more fixed in their courses.

So the wolves did not only transform the great ecosystem of Yellowstone, they also changed the park's physical geography.

#nature #ecology #wolves #yellowstone #parks

@dkloke

Every year this romantic story, that ist debunked by scientists for years.

@reticuleena

@smiddi @dkloke Dang it. Do you have a link at hand?
@reticuleena @smiddi @dkloke Seems both sides don't really care a lot about sources and research papers ;) AFAICS the research actually DOES support big parts of the narrative. https://scholar.google.de/scholar?q=yellowstone+wolves+research&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart shows there is a lot of real research on this.
Google Scholar

@reticuleena @smiddi @dkloke

"After wolf reintroduction, elk populations decreased, but both beaver and bison numbers increased, possibly due to the increase in available woody plants and herbaceous forage resulting from less competition with elk. Trophic cascades research during the first 15 years after wolf reintroduction indicated substantial initial effects on both plants and animals, [...]."

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006320711004046

@jwildeboer @reticuleena @smiddi @dkloke I think that the problem arises from time frames and the finite size of Yellowstone. The initially reintroduced wolves can get fat and happy on wildlife like deer that are plentiful and unused to their presence. So they have lots of pups. Which eventually leave to travel
downhill to discover other food sources like rancher's livestock. Expandng range is a natural thing to do. Pre-settlement, the river valleys below Yellowstone were lush ecosystems inhabited by large wildlife like bison, grizzly bears and wolves. And there was no "wild" devoid of people. Native Americans were there.

Also, especially if the Yellowstone ecosystem is not grazed by herbivores, wildfire will increase, taking out at least the under story plants and the wildlife utilizing them. But the forests are predominately lodgepole pine, which depend on fire. Nothing is static.

@Gaythia @jwildeboer @reticuleena @smiddi @dkloke We get this attitude that "wild " places exist that some how are just blank canvases waiting for rewilding ,when in fact they are usually the places with the best biodiversity and where native animals would suffer and they have human populations who live as part of the land caring for and respecting it ,they often have small numbers of livestock which are kept and looked after traditionally living free ranging so are vulnerable to predation ,
@Gaythia @jwildeboer @reticuleena @smiddi @dkloke .Theres been very effective re indtroductions of birds like the red kite ,but Wolves would be a nightmare .Rewilders sit in cafes in cities and see empty space and assume its suitable and big enough for apex predators without realising the space they need .Lynx here would be fine but the plan to introduce wolves is very bad for wildlife esp the wildcat which is already on the edge of extinction and livestock will be killed and people affected

@jwildeboer
Ah hmm ok, just had in mind, a few years ago there were these articles that this wolves-story is wrong....

@reticuleena @dkloke

@smiddi @reticuleena @dkloke Maybe you thought about those rubbish stories of wolves packs having alpha males that have been debunked over and over again? It was certainly my first impulse too :) https://wolf.org/headlines/caption-attached-to-photo-of-wolves-traveling-through-snow-as-a-pack-is-false/
Misleading caption debunked | International Wolf Center

The caption attached to a photo of a wolf pack traveling through snow is false. The photo simply shows a pack traveling through snow.

International Wolf Center | Teaching the World about Wolves.

Often shared is an article from accuweather, but no idea how trustworthy accuweather is. TheGuardian may be better:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jun/23/rebalancing-act-bringing-back-wolf-fix-broken-ecosystem-aoe

It is describing the situation and debate.

@jwildeboer
@reticuleena @dkloke

The return of the wolf: how much do they help rebuild ecosystems?

Researchers say the return of wolves to Yellowstone in the 1990s kickstarted big changes in habitats. But that narrative is increasingly being challenged

The Guardian
@smiddi @reticuleena @dkloke Of which the TL;DR is: "It's complicated" As always ;) But the article also confirms that introducing wolves (and more mountain lions and bears) did create a new balance that did cause positive changes in the ecosystem. So my conclusion: As with every story that sounds too good to be true, it is too good to be true. But in this case there are documented and proven positive changes in the ecosystem, at least partly caused by reintroducing wolves.

@jwildeboer
@reticuleena

Yes, nice we talked about it and i know now better than my initial statement.

@dkloke

@jwildeboer @smiddi @reticuleena @dkloke โ€œPositive changesโ€ for whom? The โ€œdepopulatedโ€ deer probably werenโ€™t fans of the reintroduction of their killers.

The ecological ideal is a wilderness โ€œuntaintedโ€ by man, but every ethical value implies a valuer. The problem with #environmentalism is that it advocates humans value their own absence from the world. Itโ€™s slow suicide painted over with a pretty landscape.

@mjgardner @jwildeboer @smiddi @reticuleena @dkloke humans don't have to be absent from an ecosystem for it to be stable, diverse and thriving. But the humans who are present must behave significantly different than most white people / people following european derived culture.

@dkloke
It was 31 wolves released in Yellowstone National Park in 1995-96, after a long debate since the 70's:
https://www.yellowstonepark.com/park/conservation/yellowstone-wolves-reintroduction/

Wolves were not the only species relocated in the Park. For beavers see for example:
http://npshistory.com/publications/yell/beaver-history-status.pdf

Evaluated from todays perspective, it seems to be a success-story. It certainly did not come with the spontaneous idea to release 14 wolves in the park.
Beware of easy solutions and romantic stories in a complex world. Especially on social media.

1995 Reintroduction of Wolves in Yellowstone

How wolves came back to Yellowstone

Yellowstone National Park
@Winnie_LD I see nothing romantic about this. They only were stating a summary of that the Yellowstone website was saying. Unless I missed something/the OP was edited....?

@dkloke

An important story, well told!

@monoxyd @dkloke @holgi

"We know right out of the gate it was not entirely due to wolves," he said. "Wolves had very little effect, at least early on. To attribute it all to wolves is completely unrealistic."

It's simplified, yes. Of course it is, but they did have an effect, as your article confirms.

@dkloke But hunters were inconvenienced!
@dkloke Humans screw with nature instead of allowing ecosystems their own balance. We do not deserve this beautiful Earth that we are effectively destroying.
@dkloke But what about the poor coyotes? ๐Ÿ˜ฑ
@dkloke moral; short sighted white men should stop meddling with stuff they know nothing about, which other than where to park your yacht is not much.
@dkloke wolves are a keystone species
@dkloke It was 41 wolves in 2 - 3 years actually.
@dkloke #keystone species
Beavers are also considered keystone species
@dkloke
Biodiversity restoration can be "that easy" - mostly, we don't even have to *do* anything - we must *stop* doing things!
@dkloke Republicans and NRA nuts are going apeshit. That's another benefit.