In 1995, 14 wolves were released in Yellowstone National Park.

No one expected the miracle that the wolves would bring.

It started with the wolves hunting the deer, this led to a rapid decrease in the deer population. The wolves' presence also made the deer avoid parts in the park where they were and easy prey.

Thanks to the deer's absence, those parts started to regenerate. Forests of aspen and willow trees started to flourish.

That's when things really started to happen. With trees and bushes came more berries and bugs. As soon as that happened, various bird species started moving in.

With the increasing tree population, also another species was attracted. The beaver, previously extinct in the region, moved back. And the dams they built provided habitats for otters, muskrats and reptiles.

The wolves also killed coyotes, which meant more hawks, red foxes, badgers and weasels in the park. Even the population of bald eagles and ravens rose.

But here's where it gets really interesting. The wolves changed the behavior of the rivers. With more balance between predator and prey came the possibility for other species to thrive. There was less erosion because of increased vegetation. And the river banks were stabilized, the channels narrowed, more pools formed, and the rivers stayed more fixed in their courses.

So the wolves did not only transform the great ecosystem of Yellowstone, they also changed the park's physical geography.

#nature #ecology #wolves #yellowstone #parks

@dkloke

Every year this romantic story, that ist debunked by scientists for years.

@reticuleena

@smiddi @dkloke Dang it. Do you have a link at hand?
@reticuleena @smiddi @dkloke Seems both sides don't really care a lot about sources and research papers ;) AFAICS the research actually DOES support big parts of the narrative. https://scholar.google.de/scholar?q=yellowstone+wolves+research&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart shows there is a lot of real research on this.
Google Scholar

@jwildeboer
Ah hmm ok, just had in mind, a few years ago there were these articles that this wolves-story is wrong....

@reticuleena @dkloke

Often shared is an article from accuweather, but no idea how trustworthy accuweather is. TheGuardian may be better:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jun/23/rebalancing-act-bringing-back-wolf-fix-broken-ecosystem-aoe

It is describing the situation and debate.

@jwildeboer
@reticuleena @dkloke

The return of the wolf: how much do they help rebuild ecosystems?

Researchers say the return of wolves to Yellowstone in the 1990s kickstarted big changes in habitats. But that narrative is increasingly being challenged

The Guardian
@smiddi @reticuleena @dkloke Of which the TL;DR is: "It's complicated" As always ;) But the article also confirms that introducing wolves (and more mountain lions and bears) did create a new balance that did cause positive changes in the ecosystem. So my conclusion: As with every story that sounds too good to be true, it is too good to be true. But in this case there are documented and proven positive changes in the ecosystem, at least partly caused by reintroducing wolves.

@jwildeboer
@reticuleena

Yes, nice we talked about it and i know now better than my initial statement.

@dkloke