@Sci_Fi_FanGirl
They did not realize that I'd be able to read through the lies. They were insisting that the emails were just not delivered. Here's the deal, and the bit that they did not know: I've managed an email server for a long time. It is true that in theory an email could not be delivered, and you wouldn't know about it. However, a correctly configured email server will tell the sender that the email they were trying to send was not delivered. (You get a message from the mail daemon telling you that it was not delivered, for such and such reason.)
(The "you" in what follows is the doctor in question.)
Conclusion: when you tell me that the emails were not delivered and that I did not get an error on my end, you are implying that the people responsible for email servers at Johns Hopkins don't know how to configure a server correctly.
What's more plausible? That you are lying to me, or that the engineers at Johns Hopkins are unable to find their own rear end with both hands?
I'm going to bet on the engineers, and against you.
And it was not just one email they were ignoring but multiple. No one else at Johns Hopkins was ignoring my emails. So... again... what's more plausible?
@autism101 @actuallyautistic