CHBMy question was based on this story from Politico (https://www.politico.com/news/2023/08/15/trump-georgia-case-removal-federal-court-00111240) where they write about it. Would not surprise me if they try to do it (even if the probability for it succeeding is not highest). Also done in a way to stall everything because we know that #45 like to stall everything possible as much as possible.
Bruce@stadsplanering @Teri_Kanefield @cadenza
Assuming a conviction and tRUmp becomes president (God forbid!):
If they don't try it, then the probability of successful evasion of consequences is 0. (Consequences are certain.)
If they do try it, it is greater than 0, but by an arbitrarily small amount (epsilon).
Zero vs. non-zero: they are guaranteed to try it.
One more thing:
@bruce_korb @Teri_Kanefield @cadenza I’m not agreeing on that last hashtag. But the GOP to keep all Trump-voters within their ranks because of the two-party system that exists. The GOP know they would never win an election again if they force out Trump to run as an “independent”.
One of the remarkable things is how they even could allow him to become a candidate from the start. He’s not even a Republican with his dictatorial views.
@stadsplanering @Teri_Kanefield @cadenza
I regularly use that hashtag because it accepted treason as part of Tricky Dicky's campaign in 1968, never repudiated it and, in fact, have steadily piled on more anti-American acts since. (Not stopping Watergate before compelled; okaying Reagan's Iranian hostage release 4 his win -- leading to Iran / Contra that HW Bush covered up; interfering with the FL recount handing W Bush the presidency; etc)
party b4 country invited Putin / tRUmp.