Mykel
Ars TechnicaISPs complain that listing every fee is too hard, urge FCC to scrap new rule
Broadband industry fights requirement to "list all recurring monthly fees."
Tracy HallIf they can charge the fees, they can list the fees.
John BurnsWhat a bunch of hooey...
They are acting as if they were handwriting each and every customer invoice...
🤬 🤯 😂
Judgment Dave@arstechnica The most stupid argument. Ever. Exclamation point.
Hugh (he/him) 
If you ever find a dead account (like an unused grandpa account) ISPs can't tell that it was never used. However 1 byte over the limit and overages are automatic.
The ISPs deal a commodity but want to charge boutique prices.
Actually AnnaliseComing soon to an ISP bill near you: "Listing of fees fee: $2.99/month"
Colin Pekruhn@arstechnica translation: listing all out fees is going to piss customers off and raise questions we’d rather not answer.
Timo Geusch@arstechnica It's funny how they don't seem to have a problem listing them all on one's monthly bill, though.
Sid (谷思谛) 🐺@arstechnica I don't really get what that is about. When I make a contract with a company, of course they have to list everything what I have to pay, or do I just not understand what is happening?
Ada Ґ.I think the issue is they list a line item of “taxes & fees” for $XX but don’t specify what the fees are specifically for, nor how much is tax vs fee. Result: they could hide anything in there and call it a “fee”, while hoping everyone dismisses it as tax.
@arstechnica I feel so sorry for them to have to know why they charge what they charge
🇺🇸Sleepy Liberal🇺🇦@arstechnica lol if it's too complicated then either get rid of it, or list it. What s bunch of assholes
🇺🇦 haxadecimal 🚫👑@arstechnica The lists already exist! They're in the billing system. They don't want to admit that what they're actually opposed to is transparency.
Rick@arstechnica ISPs can eat shit. You don’t have to list any fees if you use up-front pricing, you assholes.
Lothus Marque@arstechnica Screw that. They have a list somewhere for billing purposes. Pull from this, guys. >.< NOT forcing this only means that they can continue to hide surprise fees.
shadow_absorber@arstechnica this is obviously crazy considering the opposite perspective i.e where you list all the reasons you can't pay them will get you sued or your service cut