@Paulatics has, does, the committee consider the *bicycle* when considering #transportation?
We see federal and provincial interest in electric cars, & hear of aspirations for passenger trains, but with so many Canadians living in dense urban communities, the potential for bicycles (acoustic & electric) to reduce carbon emissions, city infrastructure costs & health risks as well as to improve quality of urban life, is profound. Yet we hear zip from our federal authorities. Why?
@Paulatics just to be clear, I'm not trying to be rhetorical or antagonistic. I'm genuinely puzzled.
Bicycles are so obviously the personal vehicle of the future; we make steel & aluminum & batteries in Canada, we have a history of bike design & building; we could have a bike/trike industry here (we could lead the world on #winterbiking). But our MPs seem oblivious (even Steven Guilbeault🤯).
Is it b/c the auto lobby is too rich? Or policy ppl still equate bikes with recreation?
#biketooter
@HyL @Paulatics Probably a good part of this is the constitutional division of powers. The federal government really doesn't have a lot it can do to promote bike use. Traffic planning is a local matter. Licensing (of e-vehicles on public roads) is provincial.
Federal transportation authority is specifically for interprovincial modes of transportation (trains & planes) and product safety & environmental regulations (cars).
For bikes, the main thing they can do is directed infrastructure grants.
@Paulatics @AmeliasBrain
Yes. I read @enobacon's reply & knew immediately it was from someone unaware that Canada has effectively no passenger rail system (except for rich tourists) ðŸ¤.
But a bike + bus route to the airport, and safe bike parking there, is something we *could* and should have. (Would bike storage at airports fall under your committee's purview, Senator?)
@HyL @Paulatics @AmeliasBrain @enobacon
I understand that in the Quebec City-Windsor corridor (which does hold half the country's population), passenger rail almost rises to the level of a European economic basket case country that wouldn't be admitted into the EU.
I have not used the train in that corridor, so that's just from what I've heard.
In Western Canada, the Maritimes, and the rest of Ontario and Quebec, it's purely a tourist attraction, for sure.
@dragonfrog @Paulatics @AmeliasBrain @enobacon
yes, between Hamilton & Montreal there is passenger rail & even commuter trains. But that is a tiny part of Canada's geography, & it used to be better, affordable, and an alternative to short flights.
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/whatonearth/rail-travel-canada-1.6681160
The train used to be a romantic and luxurious mode of transportation, with companies competing for passengers. But in the last century, cars and airplanes have edged out an option that — with the right investment and infrastructure — could be a cheaper and greener alternative in Canada.
If you like being frustrated, try to find trips between major Canadian cities using the ViaRail booking site ( https://www.viarail.ca/en )🤣
@Paulatics @AmeliasBrain @enobacon
#Canada
#Rail
#Travel
#AltText: Two screen shots, 1st showing search for train travel between Edmonton & Montréal, 2nd showing no train service found.
@HyL @dragonfrog @Paulatics @AmeliasBrain @enobacon
God what a tragic state.
@Paulatics @Daveography @HyL @dragonfrog @AmeliasBrain @enobacon
There was a brief time when their website showed connections off of the Canadian and on to corridor trains. Some of the connections had hilarious layovers, but they'd show it nonetheless.
But now the Canadian is reliably unreliable, with VIA giving up on any guarantees (they used to refund if over 4 hours delayed, etc). In 2022 across the whole network - including corridor - on-time performance was only 57%.
That's very bad.