@georgetakei It's one of the loopholes he wants that's so wide you could drive a truck through it.
He could get a professional blabbermouth -- or someone connected with a foreign government -- to look at a brief and say, "Yeah, that looks good", and then share sensitive information that THEY then make public... or give him some quid pro quo for, under the table...
Exactly this. Real attorneys are, among other things, officers of the court. The government's proposed protective order says that sensitive materials are to be kept in the custody of Trump's (actual, paid, with legal and ethical obligations) defense counsel, and Trump is allowed to see them but not take pictures or make notes of identifying information.
More fundamentally, Trump's objection to the proposed protective order starts with what's known in legal circles as a big fat lie, with his VERY FIRST WORD.
"President Donald J. Trump, through counsel, submits this Response..."
That first word ceased being true on January 20, 2021. Judge Chutkan would be entirely justified in ruling that the response does not refer to the defendant in this case, and is therefore summarily overruled.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149.14.0_4.pdf

@georgetakei Crowdsourced legal defense? No, more like stochastic terrorism to make potential witnesses afraid.
"IF YOU GO AFTER ME, IโM COMING AFTER YOU." -Donald J Trump
Um. I didn't know that "volunteer lawyering" was a thing with multi-billionaires.