It's not that #conservatives aren't sometimes right - it's that even when they're right, they're *highly selective* about it. Take the hoary chestnut that "#IncentivesMatter," trotted out to deny humane benefits to poor people on the grounds that "free money" makes people "workshy."

--

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/08/05/any-metric-becomes-a-target/#hca

1/

Pluralistic: America’s largest hospital chain has an algorithmic death panel (05 August 2023) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

There's a whole body of conservative economic orthodoxy, #PublicChoiceTheory, that concerns itself with the motives of callow, easily corrupted regulators, legislators and civil servants, and how they might be tempted to distort markets.

But the same people who obsess over our fallible public institutions are convinced that private institutions will never yield to temptation, because the fear of competition keeps temptation at bay.

2/

It's this belief that leads the right to embrace #monopolies as "efficient": "A company's dominance is evidence of its quality. Customers flock to it, and competitors fail to lure them away, therefore monopolies are the public's best friend."

But this only makes sense if you don't understand how monopolies can prevent competitors.

3/

Think of #Uber, lighting $31b of its investors' cash on fire, losing 41 cents on every dollar it brought in, in a bid to drive out competitors and make public transit seem like a bad investment.

4/

Or think of #BigTech, locking up whole swathes of your life inside their silos, so that changing mobile OSes means abandoning your iMessage contacts; or changing social media platforms means abandoning your friends, or blocking Google surveillance means losing your email address, or breaking up with Amazon means losing all your ebooks and audiobooks:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/08/facebooks-secret-war-switching-costs

5/

Facebook’s Secret War on Switching Costs

Update, October 1, 2021: The original version of this essay incorrectly stated that Metcalfe's Law dictated that the number of connections in a network doubled with each new user; that has been corrected, below.When the FTC filed its amended antitrust complaint against Facebook in mid-August, we...

Electronic Frontier Foundation

Businesspeople understand the risks of competition, which is why they seek to extinguish it. The harder it is for your customers to leave - because of a lack of competitors or because of lock-in - the worse you can treat them without risking their departure. This is the core of #enshittification: a company that is neither disciplined by competition nor regulation can abuse its customers and suppliers over long timescales without losing either:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/01/21/potemkin-ai/#hey-guys

6/

Pluralistic: Tiktok’s enshittification (21 Jan 2023) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

It's not that public institutions can't betray they public interest. It's just that public institutions can be made *democratically* accountable, rather than *financially* accountable. When a company betrays you, you can only punish it by "voting with your wallet." In that system, the people with the fattest wallets get the most votes.

When public institutions fail you, you can vote with your *ballot*.

7/

Admittedly, that doesn't always work, but one of the major predictors of whether it will work is how big and concentrated the private sector is. #RegulatoryCapture isn't automatic: it's what you get when companies are bigger than governments.

If you want small governments, in other words, you need small companies. Even if you think the only role for the state is in enforcing contracts, the state needs to be more powerful than the companies issuing those contracts.

8/

The bigger the companies are, the bigger the government has to be:

https://doctorow.medium.com/regulatory-capture-59b2013e2526

Companies *can* suborn the government to help them abuse the public, but whether public institutions can resist them is more a matter of how powerful those companies are than how fallible a public servant is. Our plutocratic, monopolized, unequal society is the worst of both worlds.

9/

Regulatory Capture - Cory Doctorow - Medium

Here’s a story about “regulatory capture”: Donald Trump appointed Ajit Pai, a former Verizon lawyer, to run the Federal Communications Commission, which is in charge of regulating companies like…

Medium

Because companies are so big, they abuse us with impunity - and they are able to suborn the state to help them do it:

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/testing-theories-of-american-politics-elites-interest-groups-and-average-citizens/62327F513959D0A304D4893B382B992B

This is the dimension that's so often missing from the discussion of why Americans pay more for healthcare to get worse outcomes from health-care workers who labor under worse conditions than their cousins abroad.

10/

Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens | Perspectives on Politics | Cambridge Core

Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens - Volume 12 Issue 3

Cambridge Core

Yes, the government can abet this, as when it lets privatizers into the Medicare system to loot it and maim its patients:

https://prospect.org/health/2023-08-01-patient-zero-tom-scully/

But the answer to this isn't *more* privatization. Remember #SarahPalin's scare-stories about how government health care would have "#DeathPanels" where unaccountable officials decided whether your life was worth saving?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26195604/

11/

Patient Zero

Tom Scully is as responsible as anyone for the way health care in America works today.

The American Prospect

The reason "death panels" resounded so thoroughly - and stuck around through the years - is that we all understand, at some deep level, that health care will *always* be rationed. When you show up at the Emergency Room, they have to triage you. Even if you're in unbearable agony, you might have to wait, and wait, and wait, because other people (even people who arrive after you do) have it worse.

12/

In America, health care is mostly rationed based on your ability to pay. Emergency room triage is one of the only truly meritocratic institutions in the American health system, where your treatment is based on urgency, not cash. Of course, you can buy your way out of that too, with concierge doctors. And the ER system itself has been infested with #PrivateEquity parasites:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/11/17/the-doctor-will-fleece-you-now/#pe-in-full-effect

13/

Wealth-based health-care rationing is bad enough, but when it's combined with the public purse, a bad system becomes a *nightmare*. Take hospice care: private equity funds have rolled up huge numbers of hospices across the USA and turned them into rigged - and lethal - games:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/04/26/death-panels/#what-the-heck-is-going-on-with-CMS

Medicare will pay a hospice $203-$1,462 to care for a dying person, amounting to $22.4b/year in public funds transfered to the private sector.

14/

Pluralistic: Private equity finally delivered Sarah Palin’s death panels (26 Apr 2023) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

Incentives matter: the less a hospice does for their patients, the more profits they reap. And the private hospice system is administered with the lightest of touches: at the $203/day level, a private hospice has *no* mandatory duties to their patients.

You can set up a California hospice for the price of a $3,000 filing fee (which is mostly optional, since it's never checked).

15/

You will have a facility inspection, but don't worry, there's no followup to make sure you remediate any failing elements. And no one at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services tracks complaints.

So PE-owned hospices pressure largely healthy people to go into "hospice care" - from home. Then they do *nothing* for them, including continuing whatever medical care they were depending on.

16/

After the patient generates $32,000 in billings for the PE company, they hit the cap and are "live discharged" and must go through a bureaucratic nightmare to re-establish their Medicare eligibility, because once you go into hospice, Medicare assumes you are dying and halts your care.

PE-owned hospices bribe doctors to refer patients to them.

17/

Sometimes, these sham hospices deliberately induce overdoses in their patients in a bid to make it look like they're actually in the business of caring for the dying. Incentives matter:

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/12/05/how-hospice-became-a-for-profit-hustle

Now, hospice care - and its relative, #PalliativeCare - is a crucial part of any humane medical system.

18/

In his essential book, *#BeingMortal*, #AtulGawande describes how end-of-life care that centers a dying person's priorities can make death a dignified and even satisfying process for the patient and their loved ones:

https://atulgawande.com/book/being-mortal/

But that dignity comes from a patient-centered approach, not a profit-centered one.

19/

Being Mortal

Atul Gawande, MD, MPH, is a surgeon, writer, and public health researcher. He practices general and endocrine surgery at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and is professor in both the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Harvard School of Public Health and the Department of Surgery at Harvard Medical School. He is Executive Director of Ariadne Labs, a joint center for health systems innovation, and Chairman of Lifebox, a nonprofit organization making surgery safer globally.

Atul Gawande

Doctors are required to put their patients' interests first, and while they sometimes fail at this (everyone is fallible), the professionalization of medicine, through which doctors were held to ethical standards ahead of monetary considerations, proved remarkable durable.

Partly that was because doctors generally worked for themselves - or for other doctors.

20/

In most states, it's illegal for practices to be owned by non-MDs, and historically, only a small fraction of MDs worked for hospitals, subject to administration by businesspeople rather than doctors.

That was radically altered by private equity's entry into healthcare, with waves of consolidation that saw local hospitals merged into massive national chains, and private practices scooped up and turned into profit-maximizers, not health-maximizers:

https://prospect.org/health/2023-08-02-qa-corporate-medicine-destroys-doctors/

21/

Q&A: How Corporate Medicine Destroys Doctors

Wendy Dean, who co-authored a new book about moral injury in American medicine, says working in today’s health care system is ‘not the agreement that we thought we were making.’

The American Prospect

Today, doctors are being proletarianized, joining the ranks of nurses, physicians' assistants and other health workers. In 2012, 60% of practices were doctor-owned and only 5.6% of docs worked for hospitals. Today, that's up by 1,000%, with 52.1% of docs working for hospitals, mostly giant corporate chains:

https://prospect.org/health/2023-08-04-when-mds-go-union/

22/

When M.D.s Go Union

The wave of professionals who are joining unions has now reached the ranks of physicians.

The American Prospect

The paperclip-maximizing, grandparent-devouring transhuman colony organism that calls itself a Private Equity fund is endlessly inventive in finding ways to increase its profits by harming the rest of us. It's not just hospices - it's also palliative care.

23/

Writing for NBC News, #GretchenMorgenson describes how HCA Healthcare - the nation's largest hospital chain - outsourced its death panels to #IBMWatson, whose algorithmic determinations override MDs' judgment to send patients to palliative care, withdrawing their care and leaving them to die:

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-care/doctors-say-hca-hospitals-push-patients-hospice-care-rcna81599

24/

Doctors say HCA hospitals push patients into hospice care to improve mortality stats

Patient families and doctors say HCA hospitals push patients into hospice care. Deaths in hospice care aren't counted in hospital mortality stats.

NBC News

Incentives matter. When HCA hospitals send patients to die somewhere else to die, it jukes their stats, reducing the average length of stay for patients, a key metric used by HCA that has the twin benefits of making the hospital seem like a place where people get well quickly, while freeing up beds for more profitable patients.

25/

#GoodhartsLaw holds that "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure." Give an MBA within HCA a metric ("get patients out of bed quicker") and they will find a way to hit that metric ("send patients off to die somewhere else, even if their doctors think they could recover"):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law

Incentives matter! Any corporate measure immediately becomes a target.

26/

Goodhart's law - Wikipedia

Tell Warners to decrease costs, and they will turn around and declare the #WritersStrike to be a $100m "cost savings," despite the fact that this "savings" comes from ceasing production on the shows that will bring in all of *next year's* revenue:

https://deadline.com/2023/08/warner-bros-discovery-david-zaslav-gunnar-wiedenfels-strikes-1235453950/

Incentivize a company to eat its seed-corn and it will *chow down*.

27/

Warner Bros Discovery Execs Cite Low $100M Savings From Strikes, See September End

While Warner Bros Discovery CEO David Zaslav on this morning’s Q2 earnings call for the conglom is “hopeful that all sides will get back to the negotiating room soon and that these stri…

Deadline

Only one of HCA's doctors was willing to go on record about its death panels: #GhasanTabel of #RiversideCommunityHospital (motto: "Above all else, we are committed to the care and improvement of human life"). Tabel sued Riverside after the hospital retaliated against him when he refused to follow the algorithm's orders to send his patients for palliative care.

28/

Tabel is the only doc on record to discuss this, but 26 other doctors talked to Morgenson on background about the practice, asking for anonymity out of fear of retaliation from the nation's largest hospital chain, a "Wall Street darling" with $5.6b in earnings in 2022.

HCA already has a reputation as a slaughterhouse that puts profits before patients, with "severe understaffing":

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/workers-us-hospital-giant-hca-say-puts-profits-patient-care-rcna64122

and rotting, undermaintained facililties:

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-care/roaches-operating-room-hca-hospital-florida-rcna69563
29/

Some workers at U.S. hospital giant HCA say it puts profits above patient care

HCA is a health care juggernaut, with 182 hospitals and 125 surgery centers in the U.S. and U.K. But some HCA workers worry its profit focus imperils patient care.

NBC News

But while cutting staff and leaving hospitals to crumble are inarguable malpractice, the palliative care scam is harder to pin down. By using "AI" to decide when patients are beyond help, HCA can employ #EmpiricismWashing, declaring the matter to be the factual - and unquestionable - conclusion of a mathematical process, not mere profit-seeking:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/07/26/dictators-dilemma/#garbage-in-garbage-out-garbage-back-in

30/

Pluralistic: The surprising truth about data-driven dictatorships (26 July 2023) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

But this empirical facewash evaporates when confronted with whistleblower accounts of hospital administrators who have no medical credentials berating doctors for a "missed hospice opportunity" when a physician opts to keep a patient under their care despite the algorithm's determination.

31/

This is the true "#AISafety" risk. It's not that a chatbot will become sentient and take over the world - it's that the original artificial lifeform, the limited liability company, will use "AI" to accelerate its murderous shell-game until we can't spot the trick:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/06/10/in-the-dumps-2/

32/

Pluralistic: Links, dumped (10 June 2023) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

The risk is real. A 2020 study in the *#JournalOfHealthcareManagement* concluded that the cash incentives for shipping patients to palliatve care "may induce deceiving changes in mortality reporting in several high-volume hospital diagnoses":

https://journals.lww.com/jhmonline/Fulltext/2020/04000/The_Association_of_Increasing_Hospice_Use_With.7.aspx

33/

The Association of Increasing Hospice Use With Decreasing... : Journal of Healthcare Management

rvices. In this discharge practice, the patient is considered a hospital survivor and subsequent hospice death. The purpose of the study was to determine if the decline of in-hospital mortality for six common high-volume admission diagnoses could be attributed in part to an increase in discharges to a hospice setting for end-of-life care. In this retrospective study using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2007 to 2011, we identified patients ≥18 years for six acute and chronic diagnoses: heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute myocardial infarction, acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock, septic shock, and lung neoplasm (cancer). We categorized patients according to their hospital discharge disposition as hospice or in-hospital mortality. A total of 10,458,728 patients met our criteria, of which 2.72% were discharged to hospice and 6.38% died. Compared to patients who died in the hospital, hospice patients were older, had a shorter length of stay, and experienced more comorbidities. Hospice use was more common in Medicare patients, in nonteaching hospitals, and in the South. White individuals were more likely to be discharged to hospice compared to nonwhites. Among the six selected diagnoses over the 5-year period, hospice use rose as observed mortality decreased. Our findings suggest that variability among hospitals in hospice use will affect benchmarked hospital mortality comparisons and could inappropriately reward or penalize hospitals in their public reporting....

LWW

Incentives matter. In a private market, it's *always* more profitable to deny care than to provide it, and any metric we bolt onto that system to prevent cheating will immediately become a target. For-profit healthcare is an oxymoron, a prelude to death panels that will kill you for a nickel.

35/

Morgenson is an incisive commentator on for-profit looting. Her recent book *These Are the Plunderers: How Private Equity Runs—and Wrecks—America* (co-written with #JoshuaRosner) is a must-read:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/06/02/plunderers/#farben

--

Image:
Seydelmann (modified)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GW300_1.jpg

CC BY 3.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en

eof/

Pluralistic: The long lineage of private equity’s looting (02 June 2023) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow