Me: Mastodon is the best. People are friendly, there's no manipulative algorithm, and it's full of interesting content.

Journalist: Amazing, the headline of my article will be "Mastodon is social media's new hope".

Me: Also, there are no ads.

Journalist: Interesting. Let's change that headline to "Mastodon is a toxic cesspool that is already dead".

@lowqualityfacts

๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿฝ Nailed Itโ€ผ๏ธ

@lowqualityfacts

Apropos of media reporting on #mastodon hemorrhaging accounts โ€” just saw this post on my feed โ€”

https://infosec.exchange/@jerry/110650191697957110

Jerry Bell :verified_paw: :donor: :verified_dragon: :rebelverified:โ€‹ (@[email protected])

I just read another news article about why mastodon didnโ€™t make it and is dying. Itโ€™s very sad to hear and probably explains why I have to keep adding more server capacity to handle all the people quitting mastodon.

Infosec Exchange
@bronakins @lowqualityfacts Came to say that too, Nailed it!!!
@lowqualityfacts That was an uncharactaristically high quality fact!
@lowqualityfacts welcome to the #newyorktimesdotsocial! We have lots of friend just waiting for you to buy... purchase or otherwise signup to create an account! It's free for the first 50 toots!
@lowqualityfacts Iโ€™m old enough to remember when journalism worked on a subscription basis (with ads).
It was better than this whatever this is.
@BenAveling @lowqualityfacts That worked quite well until Google and Facebook vacuumed away all their advertisers.
@lowqualityfacts
This reflecting an actual interview wouldn't surprise me at all.
@lowqualityfacts again with these high quality facts! that's it, I'm unfollowing.
@lowqualityfacts The upside is that their sites are so filled with ads... that you can't even read the headline
@lowqualityfacts YOU'RE ONLY SUPPOSED TO POST LIES AND EXAGGERATIONS
@lowqualityfacts very true.. while this might be an imaginary conversation, the fact is, corporate journalists donโ€™t get the fact that something can run on a voluntary basis and without making profits. I was reading about Market driven Journalism in someones post earlier and this reminded me that phrase.
@lowqualityfacts hey. didn't you promise to keep your facts low quality yesterday?
@brawaru I'm spiraling in the wrong direction.
@brawaru
@lowqualityfacts
That was what you might call a "low quality fact."
@lowqualityfacts There are ads. Even you put them out asking for donations. Every artist is making ads.
@Oldfartrant and how dare those artists advertise without paying their platform!

@lowqualityfacts โ€œEveryone is very aware at this point that active user numbers of Mastodon have dropped off a cliff.โ€ ๐Ÿ™„

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/06/op-ed-why-the-great-twittermigration-didnt-quite-pan-out/

Op-ed: Why the great #TwitterMigration didnโ€™t quite pan out

The flight from Musk's Twitter to the "free" fediverse never really took off.

Ars Technica
@lowqualityfacts it sucks to hear this community slandered but we know the truth
@lowqualityfacts
Thatโ€™s about right.
@lowqualityfacts This is higher quality than I've come to expect from you.
@lowqualityfacts Hey. Before I start my rant, I want to apologize to you for being the recipient. Youโ€™re not the only one here who thinks #journalists should work for free, even if they need to eat and pay rent. So, nothing personal! But still, I get tired of the self-righteous attitude here that suggests #reporters twist facts for #clicks (most donโ€™t give a shit) or that differing viewpoints always come from ulterior motives. Please be less simplistic. Itโ€™s not a good look.
@andrew I am terribly sorry about the quality of my post Andrew.
@andrew @lowqualityfacts People confuse journalist, reporter, pundit, and contributor. Contributors generate most of the clickbait through third party content mills. Yay for 'monetization'
@whitey @lowqualityfacts #Journalist is a catch-all term that nets a wide variety of people. It includes opinion bloviators and mindless trend-followers โ€” but also serious #reporters dedicated to holding those in power in accountable, #editors dedicated to getting it and doing it right, #photographers who risk their lives and safety to bring us images we never forget, copy editors who unmix metaphors and so on. Itโ€™s a lazy mistake to lump all the bad with the good.
@andrew @lowqualityfacts

I don't ask reporters to work for free, but when shit's hidden behind a paywall, it's not the payment that's the problem, it's all the creepy tracking that comes with proving that you've paid. At least with getting a paper out of the street boxes, once I've put my coins in, there's no tracking of what I've read or how/where I read it.
@ferricoxide @lowqualityfacts I get that, although itโ€™s no different from buying anything else online thatโ€™s not tangible, like music or software. If you prefer a hard copy, use your coins, if you can. I think news #paywalls irk people because they got it in their heads that news should cost nothing. But what other hard-to-make product or service is free? We pay for volts, fuel, TV, mass transit. Why should #news be different?
@andrew @lowqualityfacts

If news sites didn't include trackers and didn't indefinitely log everything, it'd be a different. Get me a news sites that does that and I'd probably sign up. It's not so much a preference for hard copy, it's a preference for not being tracked.

News consumption is in a similar category as what I read at a library ...except my local library isn't selling my interests or compiling any kinds of profiles about me. Music that I don't have on disc, I stream ...but I get something in return for being tracked: better recommendations (what do I get of value for being tracked and profiled by WaPo etc Al?). And, frankly, the music I like doesn't really say as much about me as what news stories I choose to read. There's just a strong degree of "ick" to logging into a news type of site.
@andrew @ferricoxide @lowqualityfacts True but I don't think the consumers deserve that much of the blame: we got used to having a bunch of content for free. But it turned out the free-with-ads/pay-for-none model wasn't viable, and the give-it-away-till-we-have-a-big-userbase-then-start-charging model also had issues. Good ideas perhaps, but failed experiments, and we're just caught in the aftermath for now. /2ยข
@andrew @lowqualityfacts You're not disagreeing, then, that journalists will toe the line for corporate interest because that's what pays.
@softwarepagan @lowqualityfacts Thatโ€™s nothing close to what I said. But feel free to hold on to that belief yourself, if it makes you feel good.
@andrew @lowqualityfacts Lmao he blocked me before I could even see his response. What did he say? ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ˜‚
@lowqualityfacts
This one's a little too on the nose.
@lowqualityfacts this fact makes me feel bad feelings.
@lowqualityfacts Here you are again with the High Quality facts...
@lowqualityfacts the other big thing: it's hard for them to get "engagement"
@lowqualityfacts
I wonder how long it will last. Without the algorithm there isn't the steady stream of political posts. As you say there aren't the ads either.

@lowqualityfacts let's just use ai to generate ads. like this:

You need to be prepared for an exciting night! Get ready to experience the energy of the nightlife with us. Don't miss out on this incredible opportunity!

@lowqualityfacts

Journalist: so mastodon doesn't have an emerald mine funded tech billionaire fascist creating headlines, and letting my white wing readers have something to get enraged about.

@lowqualityfacts I like this one even better than the last one.

@lowqualityfacts @pdkcooks The common denominator here - and with everything we encounter - is really โ€œbecause itโ€™s tied to profit.โ€

If we could substitute the profit motive with โ€˜Provide that which is essential for life.โ€™ And not commoditize literally everything. We would have a much saner world.

@lowqualityfacts

Mastodon ๐Ÿ˜ might think I am a toxic cesspool. They keep sending me notices they are removing some of my posts bawhahaha!

@Wilhelm Gere but he is on mastodon in a way since everbody keeps mentioning him all the time
@lowqualityfacts Why is there a high quality fact in here? I've been lied to! D:
@lowqualityfacts no media intended to manipulate you into buying things... literally communism
@lowqualityfacts i wish there was a way to have an algorithmic timeline because its easy to miss important posts from friends or news unless you read it all. Letting the user build its own algorithm in the client side would be neat. That would ease the manipulation and privacy concerns
@lowqualityfacts heyโ€ฆ whoa thereโ€ฆ. I came here for low quality facts, NOT high quality posts ๐Ÿ™ƒ
@lowqualityfacts
That last line, of course, is delivered by the editor.