Okay, a little followup on this.
I'm not actually always opposed to touch interfaces. I mean, I use my phone a lot, maybe too much.
Touch interfaces are fine for complex and dynamic situations. When you need to navigate through menues where content changes and the input methods may range from buttons to sliders to whatever and they aren't always in the same spot.
My issue is when static interfaces use touch controls. In those cases there are no benefits to having a touch interface, only the downsides.
The downsides are plentiful.
- Misinput, very easy to miss the place you intended to touch and instead touch something else
- Unregistered inputs, this is extremely common in appliances in my experience often exasserbated by cheap touch sensors
- Unintuitive interfaces, while this doesn't have to be the case, it almost always is, and is an accessability problem
- Overcomplication, this is more of an extension of my previous point but touch inputs often feel needlessly complicated when you could've just had a simple dial
- Lack of tactile feedback, a biiiig accessability concern and also a problem for neurotypical ablebodied people too as it's hard to get things right when you need to be fast which you often have to be when working with food!
And there's probably more to add to this list
@reina lack of tactile feedback and misinput are my two main issues with touch interfaces where they aught not be.
The worst is car interfaces where its nearly impossible to hit the right button the first time and certainly not without taking your eyes off the road.
I dont want haptic feedback I want physicality.
@reina
Lack of tactile feedback (and tactile discoverability) is the main, large, drawback of touch interfaces.
The other issues are very real and depressingly common. But the issue is not that they're touch interfaces but that they're cheap interfaces. Many such devices could have spent extra money on physical controls and still be just as frustrating and unintuitive to use.
@reina but isn't it cool how sleek and modern they are? and how they don't work if your hands are a little dirty? but certainly that never happens in the kitchen.
wait you didn't intend to *cook*, did you!?
🙃🙃🙃🙃
@tarajdactyl And how when I clean the cooking top, it startles me every time with an alarm that I have no idea why is sounding off? My guess is because it got wet?
Oh, and when you need to quickly turn the heat down but you need to first select the correct top, then press multiple times on this touch button that registers some of the time, all with no physical feedback while keeping your eyes on the food :^)
@tarajdactyl Looked through the manual. Turns out it's because the control panel is either covered up or wet ... like ... come on ... if it gets wet when turned off, that's most likely because you're cleaning it ... it doesn't have to warn you about that!
Only solution is to turn off sounds, which would turn off all sounds, including useful ones ...
I'm just 25 but I feel old saying this; modern tech was a mistake ... Bring back the appliances from the 80s.
@tarajdactyl @reina Yes. I want my cooking electrons gated by real rheostats which I turn with real knobs using my real hands. Just like we used to with valves and gas, when we thought gas was good.
You can add a stepper motor if you want computer control...
@binaryQ @reina Oh, they're not waiting.
yes-touchscreens-really-are-worse-than-buttons-in-cars-study-finds :
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2022/08/yes-touchscreens-really-are-worse-than-buttons-in-cars-study-finds/
@rileytaylor In general, if it requires a manual to operate, it's not simple in my book xD
But yeah, they're marketed as such because few buttons. But in practice it's the opposite. And the issue is that often old people end up buying these and don't understand them because they're not actually simple.
It would've been nice if I was given four knobs on my cooking top instead. They can still have a tiny screen for error messages I guess, since induction kinda needs to display some kinda warning if the pot isn't supported or whatever.
@rogerparkinson What would've been amazing was if the control module was an actual module and you could replace it. That way we could both get what we want.
(replacable because people have different preferences and cooking tops tend to not be smth you bring with you when you move)
@Kay I was thinking of this when I wrote my followup. Like, how would a blind person operate this cooking top? There's no way to tell which button is which?
I mean, I assume there are blind people who cook food?
When I as a sighted person struggle pressing the right button, I can only imagine a blind person.
Oh, and that's not all. There are people with disabilities that make their hands really shaky. Would make it really hard to operate this touch panel.
And there are so few alternatives these days too ...
@reina I hate when boiling water spills over the controls and causes the whole thing to shut down, because it interprets it as a finger.
Happens to me every. Single. Time.
@akosma When I read through the manual of mine, it seems it shuts down if the control panel gets wet or covered up, so I don't think it registers it as a finger.
But yeah, that sure must be annoying.
@reina yeah I always have paper towels nearby… you never know when you’re going to have to clean up water.
Also, the thing has a clock/timer, also touch based, that also resets if covered with water. So I use my smartphone instead, otherwise you lose the time information.
Electrolux FTW.
@lunareclipse Please ... uuugh! I wrote about shit like this the other day. Yours sucks even more than mine though. At least I have a digital dial on mine even if it's all whack.
My parents' microwave from the 80s is fantastic. It has two dials and an open button. One dial is for the effect and the other is the timer. When you twist the timer, it'll immediately start. I love it.