Techbros: Here's the detailed technical plans for a working Torment Nexus.
Everyone: Building a Torment Nexus is a horrible idea.
Techbros: Why won't people focus on the technical merits of the proposal.
Techbros: Here's the detailed technical plans for a working Torment Nexus.
Everyone: Building a Torment Nexus is a horrible idea.
Techbros: Why won't people focus on the technical merits of the proposal.
@chrisg That's a very similar thought that went through my head this morning after seeing this
Attached: 1 image I saw this ad today on LinkedIn. I think this is a glimpse of where things are heading with the SAG-AFTRA strike too - soon actors likeness will be a drag & drop tool where directors and producers can play god with their digital dolls, like some Titans in the clouds. This *is* the bad timeline and we should seek to discourage tools and system that remove the need for humans.
The thing that gets me is... once it's possible for people to make full movies without actors. Why do we need the hollywood studios anymore? Won't we just have independent film-makers doing fully AI movies by themselves?
@tartley: 'Or do you mean "distribution" to mean something different than me, like "access to movie theaters"?'
That plus access to streaming services for long-tail revenue. I understand that the actual act of getting movies into cinemas is easier now than it's ever been because of digital distribution, but Hollywood still has the pull to get its films into a huge number of cinemas at once at a scale that the indie studios can't guarantee.
tormentnexus.skynet
@chrisg Unless by Torment Nexus you mean Total Perspective Vortex in which case I'm onboard.
'cause Fairy Cakes.
Animated clip from the second series of the Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
@tezoatlipoca haha, haven't read the book for years, so it took me a while but the memories came back.
well played, thanks for the reminder ๐
Me: this is a terrible idea, but that's a really interesting hashing function. Is it GPL or MIT licensed?
@chrisg when I saw browser tech with
Authors:
* $name (google)
* $name (google)
* $name (google)
* $name (google)
I knew this was going to be godawful selfish bullshit.
@chrisg
Also:
By Tom Gauld.
Source: https://www.newscientist.com/article/2377304-tom-gauld-science-fiction-author-or-tech-company-boss/
@chrisg I saw a wild exchange on here recently that went like this:
Person: racist tech is bad and we should not make racist tech
Techbro: the code/model isn't racist, it's the training data that only includes a narrow sunset of people so everything is fine!
Everyone else: ....... Ok so that is still pretty bad, you see that, right?
Techbro: Nope. Please only consider how the algo could maybe have been been used in a less racist way
@transitory That problem is everywhere.
These people don't understand that technology is political. What problems we think are important enough to solve, how we solve them etc these are political decisions. And it's inconvenient for them, because 1) it's hard to think about these things and they are not that smart and 2) it bites into the bottom line,
@chrisg I think about how much I've soured on things like aerospace.
Like, fighter jets themselves are dazzling in their ability and complexity. But then you step back and see what they're made for, and it's grotesque.
"The people designing the rockets wanted to go to the moon. The people funding the rockets wanted better bombs."