"One thing I don't think people realize is that in arguments about human rights, it's not about trying to persuade the other party. It's not about them at all. They've already made up their mind.

It's about persuading the audience.

If I call out my teacher on being homophobic I'm not trying to change his opinion. I'm trying to convince any closeted kids in the room that they're not the monsters he's made them out to be.

If I argue with my aunt about how racist she's being it's not because I expect her to change her mind. It's because I'm hoping to god my cousin's kids hear and learn that maybe skin color doesn't mean what she says it means.

People will try to hush you and say 'they're not going to change their minds, don't bother' but it's not about them. It was never about them."

-sepulchritude

@antifaintl

Ding ding ding we have a winner!

When engaging in a debate or discussion, it's crucial to focus on presenting a well-reasoned rebuttal rather than attempting to convince the other side. The primary aim should be to provide counterarguments and alternative perspectives, allowing undecided individuals to make informed decisions.

@antifaintl

By respectfully challenging the arguments put forth by the opposing side, you can highlight any potential flaws, gaps in reasoning, or alternative evidence that may have been overlooked. This approach contributes to a more balanced and comprehensive discussion, enabling undecided individuals to evaluate different viewpoints and reach their own conclusions.

@antifaintl

Moreover, by presenting a well-constructed rebuttal, you have the opportunity to showcase your own perspective or provide evidence that supports your position. This helps undecided individuals understand your viewpoint and potentially influences them in your favor.

@antifaintl

The ultimate goal is to foster a constructive dialogue rather than engage in a confrontational or adversarial manner. This allows all sides to be heard and evaluated, increasing the likelihood that undecided individuals will carefully consider your arguments and potentially support your stance.

@Susan_Larson_TN

Hard no to that, Susan.

"When you argue that fascists should be defeated through debate what you're actually suggesting is that vulnerable minorities should have to endless argue for their right to exist and that at no point should the debate be considered over and won."
-Michael J. Dolan