AAA pulls back from offering insurance in Florida, following Farmers
AAA pulls back from offering insurance in Florida, following Farmers
Mr. DeSantis, why can’t the people of Florida get privately owned homeowners insurance from capitalist corporations?
Why does Florida suck at capitalism?
Is it because of climate change … or is it because fascism isn’t actually good for business, it just pretends to be, while assassinating the businesses it doesn’t like?
Could it be … BOTH?
Either way, you’re a piece of shit, Mr. DeSantis, and you can go to hell.
I shit you not Florida’s CFO blames corporate wokeness
Also I didn’t know florida has a CFO
No worries, now the Florida government will offer their own insurance in retaliation, to show them corporates who’s boss.
And that’s how, children, the capitalists became socialists.
Unfortunately, Florida already has a socialized insurance "corporation", Citizens Property Insurance Corp. Tens of thousands of policy holders this year were forced to move to other insurance companies if those companies would offer them insurance for up to 20% higher than they would get with Citizens.
You can only get Citizens if you cant get insurance through any other provider. Citizens coverage requires you to get flood insurance regardless of if you're in a flood zone or not (arguably, this is smart for Florida, but does make insurance much more expensive), and the policy doesn't cover nearly as much as you would get with other insurance companies.
As more and more news articles come out about various home owners insurance companies leaving Florida we're seeing more companion articles about how Citizens is completely fucked up. To tl;dr some stuff, basically if Florida sees a bad hurricane and Citizens has to pay out, everyone who's on citizens is royally fucked because they just don't have the money to pay out.
I have all the confidence that if Florida lost all of the free market insurance and was forced to provide a socialized universal insurance scheme that Republicans would continue to run it as competently as they currently are.
No fucking kidding, eh?
I hope that the wind shear from the el Nino holds up for the people in the US and parts of Canada. It seems like they are thinking that this el Nino might not be as much of a saving grace as usual. The current temperatures are worse than they were at the peak of any other hurricaine season, and this one is still just getting started. I’m concerned with how bad the temperatures will be at the peak.
From what I read, we haven’t really experienced this before. This year’s sea temperatures are the hottest on record. We’re already getting to the point where things will become increasingly difficult to predict.
Wait, this El Nino was supposed to be a saving grace? I’ve only heard of it meaning hotter surface temperatures. Hot summers, mild winters are what I associate with El Nino, and the opposite with La Nina.
The things I’ve read have been saying that the last few years of La Nina have made the warning trend seem more mild and now this El Nino will show how much things have actually progressed in that time.
I meant that mainly in terms of the hurricaine season. During an el Nino, the Pacific ocean begins to heat more than it normally would during a la Nina. This heat creates an undraft of sorts that pushes a lot of air towards the east. These updrafts can kind of “axe” a developing storm. They can obliterate a small hurricaine or tropical depression.
When the Atlantic ocean is hotter, the storms that come from it tend to be stronger. We have never had sea temperatures this high, so it’s a bit of a guessing game to whether or not those updrafts from the Pacific ocean will continue to “axe” storms coming in from the Atlantic. The gulf of Mexico is also pretty hot, and it lies on the other side of the jet streams that come from the Pacific updrafts.
We have to hope that a hurricaine doesn’t make it beyond that jet stream, as those water temperatures are currently perfect for a bad hurricaine.
Unfortunately, we don’t really have much data on these conditions yet, since we haven’t really seen them happen before. We will have to wait and see which of the opposing forces is stronger.
“Unfortunately, Florida’s insurance market has become challenging in recent years,” the company said in a statement emailed to CBS MoneyWatch. “Last year’s catastrophic hurricane season contributed to an unprecedented rise in reinsurance rates, making it more costly for insurance companies to operate.”
This is hilarious and sould crushingly unsurprising. People actually ended up needing to use the insurance the companies were offering soooo they are just no longer offering it. Proving once again (for the millionth time) insurance companies have absolutely zero desire or feel any moral obligation to actually help people. It is 100% purely a money making operation. The millisecond they actually have to help any of their customers out, they will bend over backwards to get out of it and if they can’t, they’ll just leave entirely and not insure you. Beautiful. God I hate insurance so much.
Insurance doesn’t work very well for things like hurricanes. When big events happen that cause large percentages of their policy holders to file claims at the same time, it results in large payouts which causes increases in price. When prices go up, people don’t insure. This combined with the fact that florida gets hurricanes means prices for insurance are high.
Maybe the state could help by introducing laws to help combat insurance fraud, but that could lead to consumers getting fucked by their insurance companies.
There is greed at play, but there is math and economics as well.
The state could also help by reviewing building codes and infrastructure to make the losses due to hurricanes less severe but, with Florida republican votes not understanding the benefits of government helping address externalities for the benefit of everyone, there’s no chance the situation will improve there…
Insurance can work just fine for things like hurricanes. Insurance companies have several methods to address it. They’re all effectively variations of buying insurance policies themselves.
Re-insurance pools are a close analog. It’s basically a bunch of insurance companies from around the planet getting together and agreeing to pool risks. Big companies also use a bunch of funky financial instruments to simulate insurance.
There’s some risk of increased systemic correlation (eg climate change may increase the risk that major hurricanes hit multiple areas around the planet simultaneously). That’s largely mitigated in that we can see it coming. Climate change is pretty prominent in their models and they can adjust premiums or stop offering policies, over time.
The bigger risk is in synthetic systemic risk. It’s burned us a bunch of times already and it’s gonna do it again. Those giant global re-insurance pools are almost certainly fine, and worth the risk, if we just use them for their intended purpose. But history shows that we’ll end up creating derivatives contracts on them and those contracts will get leveraged. Those leveraged pools end up merging and turning into giant financial time bombs.
Are you actually surprised that an insurance company is not there for the good of the people, but to make money? They did keep their contractual obligations and paid out their customers, so you cannot fault them for that.
And what the insurance companies are doing is quite normal behavior. They analyze business risks and move out of fields that are not profitable. They are now telling you that they will no longer cover you so you can find another insurance to take over business. That those other insurance companies are more expensive is just founded in the fact that Florida is already a risky state, and the risks just skyrocket through global warming. And with the water temperatures rising as they do, I expect this year to have an interesting hurricane season.
People complain again that they cannot afford to move to safer places. Maybe now they can start thinking whether they can afford not to move to safer places instead.
And if the state is going to legislate that way, there’s even more reason to pull coverage.
It’s half climate change related, and half their own doing.
Insurance is for protection against a POSSIBLE eventuality. When the event moves from “this might happen” to “this will happen”, insurance is no longer appropriate. I have flood insurance because I live in an area where we don’t have floods. I do live in an area with a fuck ton of snow though. I can’t get insurance for that because I willingly accepted the risk when I bought a house in this geography.
You can’t buy a house you know will get hit by a hurricane and then expect to pay a couple bucks a month so you can get paid $500k later when the hurricane you know would come does come.
Insurance is for accidents. You want insurance to be something it is not.
Our Baptists in Illinois when I was a kid blamed 2000s hurricanes on “sin” such as gay marriage, so that’s correct.
(In case you are wondering, I am no longer Christian— let alone Baptist. I’m an agnostic theist though!)
Whoa now. That is some prejudiced and elitest reporting. How dare anyone acknowledge the problems in florida, the sunshine state that is perfect.
In all seriousness: It sounds like this is being a bit over reported, but the extent to which they are pulling out remains to be seen. And it is going to REALLY suck for florida as people are stuck holding mortgages for condemned and washed away houses.
But it also sets a really concerning precedent. California has already seen issues (but, being a functioning government, are setting up government programs to protect people from wildfires). But more and more of the country/world are going to become uninhabitable over the next few decades and insurance companies are likely to pull out of risky areas and just raise premiums elsewhere.