If you are teaching about #propaganda in 2023, you should not be using #Chomsky as the authority on propaganda or #disinformation. Plenty still are. This is unwise, not only because he’s been wrong about important world events. His model (led by Ed Herman actually) also just misunderstands what propaganda is, focusing on structural and political economy issues in #journalism in a way that conflates the majority journalism with propaganda (which is a deliberate activity). 1/
At a time when investigative #journalists are under attack, smearing them as mass #propaganda enablers is reinforcing risk to them and seeding a generalized distrust in facts. This kind of environment does not make for brave #journalism. This theory is also stuck in 1989… #Chomsky has no conception of the contemporary #media environment - he urged people to use ‘alternative media’ at a (Image: graffiti on the door of US Capitol after Jan 6) 2/
time of community radio - but today literally anyone can set up a ‘media outlet’ or anonymous account - stressing generalized distrust in mainstream media doesn’t help people navigate the ease with which today’s propagandists seed proxy news sites or profiteer off all this. Sure there’s problems with the funding and corporate incentives of mainstream media - but a) Chomsky wasn’t the only or even first person to say this. And b) the public need to be equipped navigate the consequences of the 3/

@emmalbriant

Its certainly very difficult to navigate the media landscape these days

Chomsky's model is very flawed indeed deeply flawed, frozen in a certain period in US history, I think many of his arguments about the nature of US MSM being tied to the Pentagon and WallStreet are still true, Chomsky has always had trouble dealing with propaganda that isn't american, and has a long history of whatabouting and genocide denial, and his linguistics are also bad

Attacking journalists and this extreme factual relativism is terrible, but I think people have many legitimate reasons to distrust "mainstream" media, who themselves have been purging investigative journalists for decades. CNN or almost unwatchable.

Still, outside of scattered independent journalists, small outlets like the Intercept, there really is no viable "alternative" that can replace a professional newsroom, which is why all the void was so easily filled by psuedo news agency's like RT, Telesur or worse. It's a lot cheaper to do zero investigating and just have pundits AdLib.

I get my news from AP, Rueters, All Jazeera among others btw

@big_louse yes I agree - not sure if you saw my whole thread, I am rather critical of the issues with mainstream media reporting and especially in relation to conflicts (my own research is on this) myself… but Chomsky is not a great critique. There’s so much been written!