Can you eat wood?
I'm trying to resolve an argument.
https://kbin.social/m/nostupidquestion[email protected]/t/188550
Can you eat wood?
I'm trying to resolve an argument.
https://kbin.social/m/nostupidquestion[email protected]/t/188550
I just got started testing Google Bard, so I fed this question to it and got this reply:
No, humans cannot eat wood. Wood is made of cellulose, which is a type of fiber that is not digestible by humans. If you eat wood, it will pass through your digestive system without being absorbed. In some cases, eating wood can cause blockages in the digestive tract, which can be dangerous.
There are some animals that can eat wood, such as termites and beavers. These animals have special enzymes that help them to digest cellulose. Humans do not have these enzymes, so we cannot eat wood without getting sick.
dried wood snacks?
I have never heard of this and I can’t find anything online.
Got a link?
https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/oak-bark
Ohh, so it seems like bark is edible but wood isn't. Definitely chimes with other answers above.
Hemlock comes to mind, as with or without your proffered grain of salt, it can be eaten but is definitely not edible. Those defs are posted in a non-pedantic way above, incidentally.
Also, thanks for the chance to use the word 'proffered' in conversation, it's vanishingly rarely used outside the legal field.
I think you’re confusing the hemlock tree en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsuga
With poison hemlock en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conium_maculatum
The tree makes the best bedtime tea I’ve ever had. The herb is a common poison notorious for killing Socrates. You’re still technically accurate, but they’re very different plants.
Oh right, I just remembered that Norway did make something like “bark bread” in the past during famines, and that linked Wikipedia article says:
The inner bark is the only part of a tree trunk that is actually edible; the remaining bark and wood is made up of cellulose, which most animals, including humans, cannot digest.
I should think you can, depending on the wood, many can be toxic.
The bark of a Willow tree is used to make Aspirin, we smoke paper and eat many plants with less woody stems. There are certain other barks and cambium (the soft layer between the bark and the wood) that contain nutrients, such as birch, pine, elm and a few others that have been eaten by our ancestors for centuries and even have medicinal properties.
The real issue is that the hard cellulose in the actual wood part is not particularly digestible and basically pure fibre and devoid of any real nutrient value. So it would need to be boiled or blended first I imagine, or steeped as a tea. It would be revolting or taste like nothing and probably give you constipation but I doubt you would die.
As a raw bite of a chunk of wood, no. It would be considered inedible.
Eat: put (food) into the mouth and chew and swallow it.
Edible: fit or suitable to be eaten.
Can you eat wood? Yes. Is it edible? Not generally.
Wood is less than half cellulose by weight, so wood must be safe to easy.
This mercury sandwich is less than half bread by weight, so it must be safe to eat.
If somrthig is part edible and part not, then it really depends on the nature of that not edible bit. If it’s inert, then great. If it’s not, then you could be kinda fucked.
The fact that somrthig is 45% edible says precisely nothing about whether or not it is edible.
You think a mercury sandwich isn’t a realistic representation of wood.
Wow, you know, after careful consideration I think you may be right. Thanks for your wisdom. Truly enlightening.
This simply isn’t true at all and I have no idea why you would even make that up. Pine is the most diverse family of conifers with over 800 different species, many of which are used in a variety of cuisine and teas. I’ve been chewing on white pine needles all my life as they’re known to be rich in vitamins and help reduce dehydration.
Then there’s the fact that almost all species of pine produce edible nuts. The species that produce the largest nuts are cultivated for commercial sale which is why you can find pine nuts in high end grocery stores and fine cuisine.
Because I’ve been told by every single scout master and naturalist my entire life that pine resin is toxic and not to eat pine needles, cones or bark or to use pine wood in a cooking fire.
They were always referring to a singular type of tree. Not the entire family Pinaceae. If that tree has another name, I don’t know it.
I once ate a burrito that was free if you could finish in one sitting, it was 6lb. It weighed around the same as my first child when he was born.
For the first few hours of his life, all I was thinking was “how the fuck did I eat something the same weight as you”
Depends on your definition of "eat".
If you mean "Can be chewed and swallowed without causing undue harm", then, yeah, you can eat wood. Well, most wood, I'm sure there's some out there that are some level of toxic to humans.
If you mean, "can be consumed as a source of nutrition", then, no, you can't eat wood. Humans lack the capability to digest it.
William Osman and crew attempted to find the breaking point on this in his video “How Much Sawdust Can You Put In A Rice Crispy?”
Wood has no nutritional value to humans, but a few things come close:
The center of banana tree trunks are cooked and eaten, and a common parts of some asian dishes, but they aren’t really “wood”.
The inner part of tree bark is digestible by humans, but it is not classified as “wood” either.
Yes, and you probably have unknowingly eaten it.