So, who's going to get one of these professionally printed, and then make some conservatives brains explode when they're told it's a US flag?
Because at this point, the Flag Code isn't changing. The US gov't isn't going to revise it for specificity for some people goofing with the design.
This is the new flag that will be flown across America.
The trans-american flag if you will
I will not apologize.
Fuck it, what the fuck is stopping me from making these myself?
hold on, gotta reach out to some folks.
@ellenor2000
Yes.
Be the chaos.
@neko I will accept that there is a diagram describing the precise layout of the flag, and assert that, under a "founding fathers" approach to US regulations, they don't matter.
If conservatives can ignore every bit of social progress made in the country to suit their own ends, why can't we ignore every bit of design progress made in the US flag, and declare that the US flag is whatever we want it to be, with a specific focus on malicious compliance?
@Anarkat The US flag code is so fun. Nationalism and all the unironic trappings of state-as-identity can go screw themselves, but I love it so much as a thing that exists.
Basically every single bit of bunting you've ever seen is against the law. Flag-burning is not only significantly less forbidden than flag tanktops and fourth-of-july-napkins, but can in fact be argued to be positively suggested. The flag is itself considered a living thing.
@wilbr @Anarkat Recommended, not mandated. (Some people do burial, e.g.) The phrasing is specifically "preferably" -- in full:
"""
(k) The flag, when it is in such condition that it is no longer a fitting emblem for display, should be destroyed in a dignified way, preferably by burning.
"""
But here's the thing.
The flag becoming(/being in general) a symbol of brutal oppression and racism, of ever-reaching imperialism, of violent nationalism...
... how can that condition be anything BUT "no longer a fitting emblem for display"!
@rabcyr
You are correct
And it doesn't matter.
@Anarkat They might have missed this part:
"The flag of the United States for the purpose of this chapter shall be defined according to sections 1 and 2 of this title AND Executive Order 10834 issued pursuant thereto." [Emphasis mine]
EO 10834 (plus the attachment) says where the stars and lines go.
Thanks Monika! Alt-text is very important for the rather large community of blind and partially sighted people on the Fediverse. 😀
Fortunately there's an edit function to display its technical superiority. :-9
@leo
Doesn't matter, the world is what we make it.
This is a US flag because I believe it is.
@Anarkat I would argue that (sadly) this is not a compliant flag because the flag code specifies „a blue field“ and this has two. Maybe connect them with a bit of blue on the hoist side?
This would also technically make it a „thin blue line“ flag, further annoying a certain kind of people.