Okay, so in Schedule A cases, the argument in support of joining hundreds of Amazon sellers is usually something like "they're all secretly working together" or "at least selling products from a common source."

So this quote, from one of the leading plaintiff's attorneys, really stood out to me.

https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/06/20/1075088/chinese-amazon-seller-counterfeit-lawsuit/

#ScheduleA #CivProMatters #Joinder

The counterfeit lawsuits that scoop up hundreds of Chinese Amazon sellers at once

US law firms have been taking on small Amazon sellers over trademark infringement—and it’s big business.

MIT Technology Review

Just for an example of what these allegations look like, here's the joinder-supporting allegation from PopSockets v. Schedule A

https://www.scribd.com/document/656897044/PopSockets-v-Schedule-A-1-22-cv-00870-Complaint

PopSockets v. Schedule A (1:22-cv-00870) - Complaint | PDF | Trademark | Mobile Device

PopSockets v. Schedule A (1:22-cv-00870) - Complaint

Scribd
@design_law Kind of a Wickard v. Filburn vibe to it