This is another case involving the question of personal jurisdiction over online sellers. #CivProMatters
Does the NBA Properties case mean that a single test buy is always sufficient to manufacture personal jurisdiction over an online seller in Illinois? Judge Blakey has been saying "no." E.g., XYZ Corp. v. Schedule A, No. 1:25-cv-13387 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 5, 2026), ECF 28. #CivProMatters
Personal jurisdiction in the 7th Circuit: In Liu v. Monthly, No. 25-02074, which will be argued today, the appellant argues that they were not subject to personal jurisdiction in the NDIL because they "did not sell or ship a single accused product to Illinois." #CivProMatters
This case is about personal jurisdiction in #ScheduleA cases. SAFE is trying to get the Seventh Circuit to expand its NBA rule and say that a mere offer to sell or ship to the forum is enough. #CivProMatters

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:hvwhptk4oerwsuzau66ikwfy/post/3mccrvkoyek2b
Columbia University files a motion to dismiss the Columbia Sportswear case. While the news coverage I've seen so far focuses on the brief's nod to the merits (prior use by the university), the motion actually focuses on personal jurisdiction and venue: www.scribd.com/document/937... #CivProMatters
Anyway, for more on Form 18 and the effect of Twiqbal, this is a pretty good explainer. #CivProMatters

Life After Form 18: A One-Year...
Life After Form 18: A One-Year Retrospective on Pleading Direct Infringement

Authored by Jonathan J. Fagan and Jason E. Stach Form 18 provided a simple way to plead direct patent infringement. It required a party to provide little more than the asserted patent number and a gen...

Finnegan | Leading IP+ Law Firm