The #LibreTexts team is happy to continue to support Mizzou Academy's efforts as part of our #LibreNet consortium! Thank you for helping ensure the future of #education is #open.

#OpenEd #TheFutureIsOpen #OER

@LibreTexts when you say "#open" what do you mean? Because you keep using that word...

I'd appreciate seeing your definition.

@lightweight thanks for asking. We use #open to primarily mean the 5R's codified via #CreativeCommons and #GNU licensing. We do have some content that doesn't follow this (e.g. content w/ an ND clause); in these cases #open
means #OpenAccess. Everything created on the #LibreTexts site is #OER open.

For code, we refer primarily to GNU and MIT licensed open-source content.

We hope this helps answer your question. Let us know if we can clarify anything else related to our greater #LibreVerse.

@LibreTexts the words #open and #libre are used in the software context to refer to code that is available under an OSI approved open source license, & libre more specifically refers to a #Copyleft (shared-alike) license. Is any of your software open source or Copyleft licensed? What about your flagship software?

I looked on your website and couldn't find any evidence of any open source code to download. Everything I found appeared to be proprietary, i.e. not at all '#open'.

@lightweight we understand the software community has specific understandings of the terms #open and libre but our focus is more geared toward developing and distributing #OER than developing and distributing the tech around it. That said, all our tech, with the exception of the libraries which are proprietary by NICE CXOne, is open source and can be download via github: https://github.com/LibreTexts
LibreTexts

LibreTexts has 53 repositories available. Follow their code on GitHub.

GitHub
@LibreTexts I couldn't find any reference to your open source code on your website... did I miss it? Also, why (especially with your chosen brand) wouldn't you make *all* your software open source? Unless someone can replicate your entire stack independently, it might as well *all* be proprietary. Creating #OER that requires your proprietary software seems very much against the spirit of the #open & #libre you trumpet everywhere. From my perspective, it seems your organisation is #openwashing.

It might be time for a broad (and thoughtful) conversation on the limits of openness, in the #OpenEcosystem? How do #OpenGovernment and #OpenData work within the #FreeSoftware framework? Do #OERs run the risk of promoting #fauxpen and #OpenWashing?

@lightweight @LibreTexts

@enkerli As you can imagine, I'd certainly be keen to have that broader discussion.

@LibreTexts

@lightweight Maybe we should plan something small in a few weeks? Bringing diverse actors together for a thoughtful chat, either realtime (with timezone challenges) or asynchronously through an appropriate platform? I’m thinking of a number of people to invite, who are willing to engage in those issues at a “co-design” level. Establishing common ground?
@enkerli I'm sure we'd be interested, and we could provide a range of uncompromised platforms for co-design. We can invite people to our Matrix instance (persistent chat), BigBlueButton (video conference), Discourse (discoverable discussion), NextCloud + OnlyOffice for collaborative document writing, etc. All are, of course, #LibreSoftware.
@lightweight Yep! Apart from OnlyOffice (was mostly thinking about Collabora), they’re all part of the documentation I’m building for my #KnowledgeTransfer, at my current dayjob.
(Blindside Networks' BBB got started at Carleton’s Technology Innovation Management Program, where research on Open/Libre/Free models is core. @openedtech now uses it for its meetings and leverages Matrix for chat.)
@enkerli Nice! For what it's worth, we've decided that OnlyOffice is well ahead of Collabora at this point, but we've got both, so we can adapt quickly if that changes 😀 Cool re BBB - it's great, eh. And re Matrix, that means we can all talk to one another without having to leave the familiar comfort of our chosen Matrix instances 😎 Federation is far more advanced and civilised than the centralised proprietary options. @openedtech

@lightweight @openedtech Good to know about OnlyOffice (our small association for Free Software in Higher Ed will be interested).
And I’ll soon be free to explore more options.

As for federation, my personal reactions tend to be very positive. Yet it’s clear that a lot of it depends on usage patterns and community relations (not to mention “governance models”). My guess is that @evan would agree.

@enkerli
Happy to provide access to one of our instances for you to try and compare. And I agree that (decentralised) federation, though technically more complex, is ab inherently better approach than (centralised) stand-alone, especially from a resilience and sovereignty perspective.

@openedtech @evan

Install NextCloud Hub and OnlyOffice on Ubuntu 22.04 with Docker Compose | OERu Technology Blog

This is another update of my previous posts (installing NextCloud with Collabora Office Online on Ubuntu 16.04 and then NextCloud with OnlyOffice on Ubuntu 18.04). I'm updating it thanks to my colleague in edtech, Stephen Downes' heroic videos showing how he went through this process using my 18.04 instructions on 22.04, running into a few minor issues... this update seeks to remedy the problems he encountered with the older tutorial.