@yowtfbecool @anildash @Mastodon @devs I don't see why it would be incompatible without a lot of effort.
A cloud infra company thrives with many successful subscribers and chokes when they're big enough to run their own infrastructure (i.e. Facebook doesn’t need Fastly). Privacy invasion comes from an ad-based revenue model when end-users need to be converted to revenue; cloud infra is B2B subscription model with neither incentive nor easy access to end-users.
@opendna @anildash @Mastodon @devs
you're right that they aren't necessarily incompatible. a major undertaking, but it will happen if there is a good opportunity there.
wrt ad-rev model: the data handled by cloud services will be of relative low quality. however, it won't be of zero value, meaning revenue potential exists. now, consider that a public company has a duty to generate returns f/ investors. what value ($$) represents an opportunity? see: the credit collections industry.
@yowtfbecool @anildash @Mastodon @devs You're right and I don't dispute your logic. Fastly trades on a certain ethic which precludes the behavior I think you're describing. It would be an exceptional bag which made betraying both customers and employees attractive to shareholders.
Unlikely but, as we saw with Twitter, not impossible.