Okay, Mastodon friends, I rarely ask for amplification about my day job, but I personally pushed for my employer to make a big investment in enabling the fediverse, and I'd love for everyone to show that the support is appreciated. On June 28, you can join us for a (FREE!) hands-on conversation about how the Fastly team worked to support @Mastodon while the service was under a *massive* DDOS attack. Everyone who cares about scaling the fediverse should join: https://learn.fastly.com/security-mitigating-ddos-and-traffic-surges-with-mastodon @devs
Mitigating DDOS in the Fediverse with Mastodon | Fastly

Experts from Mastodon and Fastly’s CSOC team share lessons learned from mitigating DDOS attacks on Mastodon Social and techniques for protecting federated architectures.

@anildash @Mastodon @devs

Fastly is a publicy-traded company with revenues in the hundreds of millions. Are "Publicly-traded cloud computing company" and "decentralized, privacy-focused social media service" compatible concepts?

@yowtfbecool @anildash @Mastodon @devs I don't see why it would be incompatible without a lot of effort.

A cloud infra company thrives with many successful subscribers and chokes when they're big enough to run their own infrastructure (i.e. Facebook doesn’t need Fastly). Privacy invasion comes from an ad-based revenue model when end-users need to be converted to revenue; cloud infra is B2B subscription model with neither incentive nor easy access to end-users.

@opendna @anildash @Mastodon @devs

you're right that they aren't necessarily incompatible. a major undertaking, but it will happen if there is a good opportunity there.

wrt ad-rev model: the data handled by cloud services will be of relative low quality. however, it won't be of zero value, meaning revenue potential exists. now, consider that a public company has a duty to generate returns f/ investors. what value ($$) represents an opportunity? see: the credit collections industry.

@yowtfbecool @anildash @Mastodon @devs You're right and I don't dispute your logic. Fastly trades on a certain ethic which precludes the behavior I think you're describing. It would be an exceptional bag which made betraying both customers and employees attractive to shareholders.

Unlikely but, as we saw with Twitter, not impossible.

@opendna @anildash @Mastodon @devs

in the end, something is better than nothing. if we trust in our paranoia and remain vigilant, we can, at the very least, afford ourselves the delusion of privacy.