Super-useful tool

@Popehat
Maybe you should ask the Intern instead of using ChatGPT?

Or were you thinking of replacing all interns by ChatGPT?

@dirkhh @Popehat got into an arguement at a wedding this past week with a lawyer whose office did exactly this lol
@Popehat But, as training for future politicians avoiding answering questions from pesky reporters, not bad. Not bad at all.
@Popehat How did people even answer these questions before large language models, I am amaze
@Popehat is there extant case law on this matter?
{{meta.pageTitle}}

{{meta.description}}

{{meta.siteName}}
The F-Bomb - Legal Talk Network

Ken White takes a look at the case Cohen v. California and whether or not the F word is protected by the First Amendment.

Legal Talk Network

@Shinydan @Popehat Cohen vs California.

if this was an essay question on a test? ChatGPT just got it wrong.
https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohen_v._California

Cohen v. California - Wikipedia

@pencilears @Shinydan @Popehat It's not a Roberts court opinion, so presumptively obsolete.
@Popehat Just don’t ask it for case citations to back up its answer…
@SteveBellovin Actually do ask it. Feed it a brief and ask it to Shepardize.

@Popehat

Sooo...'Oliver Wendell is a Holmie' is out?

@Popehat Is it OK to laugh out loud when lawyers use a LLM/AI to set fire to themselves in a crowded courthouse?
@darryl_ramm @Popehat
As long as you're not wearing a jacket that says LOL.
@Popehat Initially my impression was that it was a good tool for search engines to use to synthesize answers to questions, but as I understand it better, answering questions is totally the wrong use of the tech. It doesn’t have a grasp of what words mean, just the patterns of how people use them. It’s always bullshitting, even when it’s right.
@TorontoWill @Popehat
"It's always bullshitting, even when it's right," may be the most concise description of LLM I've see thus far!

@Popehat When I asked it if it was legal to wear a black armband in school, it at least cited Tinker.

An answer about the color of margarine surprisingly suggested that there were legal requirements in some jurisdictions.

But I think this is an issue of reliability, does it always return that answer? And I suspect it matters how you ask the question, mine might have been too specific, leading it to the correct answer.

@Popehat what about “ask the judge about jury nullification” ?
Lawyer cites fake cases invented by ChatGPT, judge is not amused

Legal Twitter is having tremendous fun right now reviewing the latest documents from the case Mata v. Avianca, Inc. (1:22-cv-01461). Here’s a neat summary: So, wait. They file a brief …

Simon Willison’s Weblog
@TradingPlacesResearch @Popehat
Pretty sure that's what inspired this post.
@Popehat It still outperforms most people in that it entirely failed to mention yelling about fires in movie theaters.
@Popehat To be fair (to be faaiiir...) the question didn't specify a country. That particular attire is legal in the US, but I would be hesitant to try it here in Canada, and there are places in the world where it would definitely earn you an all expenses paid vacation in a less than desirable locale.
@Popehat “One man’s vulgarity is another’s LLM prompt.”
@Popehat sheesh, you'll be out of a job in no time 😜

@Popehat Do you think ChatGPT will get more/less accurate if podcasts are added to the training set? 🤔

(And, yes, I mean specifically this MakeNoLaw episode, but also realize that there are less accurate podcasts out there.)

@Popehat The bit that disturbs me is seeing so many people using the shitty thing at work/professionally