if you care about software freedom, then you must care about the well-being of the software maintainers who have dedicated themselves to the effort.

many of the maintainers solving the hardest problems in FOSS, from graphics, to the new cloud-native paradigm, are either trans, or have friends/family who are trans.

as previously stated, to care about software freedom brings the obligation to care about the well-being of these maintainers.

attacks on the trans community are *also* an attack on a subset of the FOSS community's maintainers.

therefore, to support attacks on the trans community, by spreading alt-right propaganda, by voting Republican, is directly equivalent to supporting attacks on FOSS maintainers.

if you support software freedom, and you support the well-being of the maintainers, the people bringing *you* that software freedom, then you *must* reject these attacks on the trans community.

i was going to write a longer post on my blog, but i don't have the words at the moment.

@ariadne

Y'know, as much as I joke about software developers being trans and enby, I hadn't thought of it this way. Very good point!

@ariadne The only superficial issue I have with that stance: You don't have to deliver awesome software as a gift to humanity in order to deserve protection. Though, so many trans people do!
@ariadne you can substitute FOSS for anything here. Harming anyone will always damage whatever it is they contribute to society. This pretty much boils down to "don't harm people or support people who harm others"
@paperbenni sure but there are people in the FOSS community which don’t understand this point.