If Facebook and Instagram were to join the Fediverse and you could follow users from that world from your instance, would you do it?

Boosts appreciated. I'd like to know the current consensus of the Fediverse.

#Meta #Facebook #Instagram #SocialMedia #Fediverse

Yes
43.1%
No
29.4%
I'd block them all / Fediblock
27.5%
Poll ended at .
@rolle We know what Meta does, and until they don't clean house, we really don't need to wait to see them doing it again.
@rolle Probably as it would make it easy for me to close my FB. Though these days, the most useful thing about it is the groups tbh.
@rolle hahaha, fuck no, I don't want my family following me here
@sortius @rolle I’ve been off Facebook and their properties for a decade, I’m absolutely blocking their entire instances
@lilstevie @sortius @rolle maybe we can have a one way solution. We can follow FB but they need over approval or something. Or like we can choose to publish to FB'ers or not 
@sortius @rolle
I was looking for good points. Thanks
@rolle before blocking, want to know how this works. Indeed again panic thought off zuckerberg
@redegelde History has shown us it will work out like this: They will try to rip all the data they can get.
@rolle yesterday give presentation over Mastodon someone said, now Mastodon got all my data ;-)
@redegelde @rolle
How did you respond Eric?
@me @rolle well it was clear that this user was anti social. No account on everything. I told him to be wise what you want to share. And on different thing. On fediverse your are in control
@redegelde @rolle
Ah thats .... one way to avoid problems ... 🤣
And missing out on possibilities as well.
@rolle @redegelde But what data is there, that they can't already get by scraping public stuff? The only thing I can think of are private messages to their instance.
@daniel @rolle only thing ik can think about is reading user post and target them from bot with commercial or else
@rolle there's no one I'd really want to follow, but if I find someone of interest on the Facebook or Instagram instances, I'll give them a follow. I'm personally more interested in Tumblr joining at a still unknown date. I do have people there I'd like to follow.
@rolle I wanted to vote no, but it recorded "yes."
@ArtseaGardener @rolle
Just tried it.
I voted "Fediblock"; it registered "Yes".
@miguelpergamon Well that's strange. @ArtseaGardener
@miguelpergamon @rolle
I assumed it was my fingers but wanted the survey to be accurate. Old teachers never stop worrying about assessments lol
@ArtseaGardener @rolle
My chubby-fingers are only chubby enough to have hit "No" accidentally, so I'm going to say that there's definitely some problem somewhere.
🤷
@miguelpergamon @rolle @ArtseaGardener The color isn't showing your vote. It's just showing the highest voted answer.
@daniel @rolle @ArtseaGardener
I hope so. Doesn't it usually show a tick for the answer you've selected?
@miguelpergamon @rolle @ArtseaGardener I think the app handles it a bit different than the web interface.

@daniel @rolle @ArtseaGardener
Let me put a *sigh* there. 🤕

The web version of Mastodon threw me out on Thursday as I dont have a Mastodon account and I can only log in through my Kolektiva account.

I'll go see what it's doing now ...

@daniel @rolle @ArtseaGardener
Success! (?!?) 👍

@miguelpergamon @daniel @rolle

Thank you! Nice interactions & I walk away learning something. That's a good day on the interwebs. Time to go outside!

@rolle
We don't need advertising
@rolle Just because I'm not using either now, so I can't think who I would follow.

@rolle how is this actually working, technically?

what does "follow a FB user from Mastodon" mean?

if it is just import their feed into mine, like calling an api, I can't see why that would be a problem

@codebyjeff @rolle Mastodon is actually built on the ActivityPub protocol, meaning that anything that uses that same protocol, like for example Calckey (what I'm on now), can speak with Mastodon users

There's other platforms like Pixelfed, Akkoma, Friendica, and soon Tumblr

@freeplay @rolle Thanks!

Yes, I understand that bit. What I'm not clear on is the comments in this thread about "Social Media X controlling what I see"

It makes it sound like they think there would be some sort of push mechanism from them *into* your feed, rather than you just pulling in feeds you like to follow

That doesn't make sense to me, nor that having these companies in the Fediverse could do anything "bad" to you

@rolle yes, but only surgically precise selected content.

@rolle Let's just hope Instagram doesn't pull a Google Talk.

Google Talk used to be able to communicate with any XMPP server... and then they pulled out.

@rolle I have little to no interest in their local/federated feed. But yes I would follow anyone interesting and my friends who refused to move.

Basically everything on the fediverse is public anyway. If you want privacy, you should pivot to jabber, signal, revolt, or element.

The important point about the fedi is less the privacy and more the lack of algorithm manipulation, the moderation, the freedom to migrate your account, the web of consent, etc.

@matthieu_xyz
There’s still a privacy issue because if you federate w/a privacy abuser, you contribute to the data stockpile (read: profits) of that abuser. It’s not that Meta can see the fedi data (that’s the case anyway), but participating in a network w/the abuser facilitates the /creation/ of data on their assets that would not otherwise occur. Your conversation w/a Meta pawn helps Meta collect more data associated to their pawns. Like feeding an alcoholic’s codependency.

@rolle

@koherecoWatchdog

I already have an instagram account. All of my friends have one. I still use it because that's the only way to stay in touch.

Now what's the lesser evil between contributing to meta on instagram where I signed up and accepted their terms and services VS contributing to meta by federating from a place where all my messages are public but copyrighted until proven otherwise.
@matthieu_xyz That question is only simple if you establish your own 1 person instance just for IG. If you want to pollute a more public community fedi instance, then the answer is more complex as many people then inadvertently feed the adversary & become needlessly compromised in many ways.
@matthieu_xyz And luckily we are not limited to those two options anyway b/c there is a 3rd way to stay in touch: your friends join the fedi. It is not you who has the responsibility to join an oppressive network; it is the IG/FB pawns who have the responsibility to join the open free world to stay in touch w/you.
@matthieu_xyz One person can make a big difference here. I recently had to communicate w/a class of students. *All* of them were on #Facebook. I stood my ground. So they all had to step outside of Facebook to reach me.

@rolle

Depends on who they are.

Some yes.
Some no.

Some I'd block.

@rolle nope, no room for tech bros and their bullshit in the fediverse. If they wanna make individual accounts that's on them, but we're not letting them control the shape of the platform for sure, and I definitely don't consent to them having access to my fedi data
@rolle I would had not follow them, but I would let them comment and discuss with them if they would like

@rolle YES, of course!

Such a change should be welcomed. I'll be delighted to connect with my friends who finally manage to free themselves from the walled gardens :)

@rolle
I would absolutely not want them to present my content and monetizing it by combining it with adverts.
No no no.
I would definitely block the instance.
@rolle
Meta is cancer. It will destroy the fediverse and it's worrying to see how many here don't realize that. Fediblock with extreme prejudice
@ophiocephalic What makes Meta worse than Google, Apple, Bytedance, etc?
@tristen
I didn't compare Meta to any of those others. This is a non-corporate community owned and operated network and I believe it should stay that way!
@ophiocephalic @rolle Human ingenuity will find a way... how about "halfway-house" instances where people whose primary instances have defederated corporate instances, can run secondary accounts to interact with members of corporate instances?
@michaelgraaf @rolle
All that trouble to engineer around Meta? Best would be if the fediverse responded the way it did to Gab, with a unified fediblock stand. Unfortunately it doesn't sound like we're going to get there this time
@rolle I'd simply love it. I can't think of a better future for SoMe.
@rolle @pgs If only user generated content gets published, I would do it. Otherwise I would block them all.

@rolle people use a wide spectrum of email providers but we can all email each other. If people want to be on a webmail platform that shows them ads, that’s their choice. I prefer to be on a platform that’s ad-free and gives me a significant amount of control, like @fastmail.

Either way, I want to have two-way communication with everyone. So if large social corps want to enter the Fediverse so we can all connect with each other, I’m all for it. And if they become bad actors, they get blocked.

@rolle Absolutely gonna block. I don’t need that Meta bs over here, too.
@rolle
I would like to say maybe.
@lfalkens @rolle Follow as easy as block non-human and excessive users (for my subjective definition of "not cool").
@rolle I'm primarily here to avoid those platforms. That's a hard block from me.