A group of 18 European Parliament Members have issued a statement officially calling for #Degrowth.

Here is part of what they wrote...
______________________________

We believe that the current economic model, based on endless growth, has reached its limits.

Firstly, continuous economic growth, especially based on the consumption of fossil fuels, is leading to catastrophic global warming.

Secondly, the infinite pursuit of growth relies on the depletion of natural resources, the destruction of biodiversity, and the accumulation of waste and pollution. This also poses risks to our health, our economies, and our societies writ large.

Thirdly, the current economic model is contributing to social inequality and exclusion. The emphasis on economic growth has not translated into equal distribution of wealth or opportunities. Instead, it has resulted in a concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few leaving many behind.

Fourthly, the current economic model is inherently unstable and prone to crises, as seen, for example, during the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. The pursuit of growth at all costs has created a global economic system that is fragile and vulnerable to shocks.

We need an economic system that prioritises human well-being and ecological sustainability over GDP growth, one that recognises that infinite growth on a finite planet is impossible.

We also believe we need to find new ways of organising our economies without relying on the continuous exploitation of resources and the constant increase in production and consumption.

We call for more pluralism in economic thinking within EU institutions and for its alignment with the scientific evidence of climate, ecological, and social sciences.

We call for economic models and other decision-support tools to be more diverse, more comprehensive, and more readable for citizens.

We call for decision-making processes to be aligned with our common policy objectives rather than on the basis of the variation of GDP figures.
______________________________

FULL STATEMENT -- https://www.euronews.com/2023/05/10/moving-beyond-growth-is-not-only-desirable-it-is-essential

Names of those who signed on as co-authors: Philippe Lamberts (BE), Bas Eickhout (NL), Ville Niinisto (FI), Manuela Ripa (DE), Marie Toussaint (FR), Ernest Urtasun (ES), Kim Van Sparrentak (NL) — Greens/EFA; Manon Aubry (FR), Petros Kokkalis (EL), Marisa Matias (PT), Helmut Scholz (DE) — The Left (GUE/NGL); Pascal Durand (FR), Aurore Lalucq (FR), Pierre Larrouturou (FR) — Socialists & Democrats (S&D); Sirpa Pietikainen (FI), Maria Walsh (IE) — European People’s Party (EPP); Katalin CSEH (HU) — Renew Europe (RE); and Dino GIARRUSSO (IT) — Non-attached (NI).

#Europe #EU #Politics #Environment #Climate #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis #Biodiversity #Pollution #Inequality

Moving beyond growth is not only desirable — it is essential

VIEW | The pursuit of growth at all costs has created a global economic system that is fragile and vulnerable to shocks, and this needs to change, a group of European Parliament Members (MEPs) write.

euronews
@breadandcircuses I strongly agree with all of this. But "Degrowth" is terrible, terrible branding. It's the first thing people will see, and they will immediately think "But growth is good" and write it off.

@mike @breadandcircuses Although it does beg why people assume growth is good.

After all, cancer is nothing but growth.

@lispi314 @breadandcircuses I have heard this "cancer is a growth" line before, and while it's not wrong it's a bit facile.

Cancer is the growth of tissue with no purpose. When capitalism is working right, it's very much growing things that do have purpose: scientific advances, health care, infrastructure, education, etc.

The problem is not growth per se. It's uncontrolled of goalless growth.

@mike @breadandcircuses Not really, capitalism promotes growth for the purpose of capital and/or power accumulation. It is either circular & pointless or actively harmful, depending on which it is.

The value of things has absolutely nothing to do with it, otherwise #ChokePointCapitalism (https://time.com/6219423/chokepoint-capitalism-doctorow-giblin/), #Monopoly and other things associated with late-stage capitalism wouldn't be a thing.

Why We Should All Be Worried About 'Chokepoint Capitalism'

'Chokepoint Capitalism', by Cory Doctorow and Rebecca Giblin, argues corporations succeed by crushing competition and locking-in customers

Time

@lispi314 @breadandcircuses The verdict of history on non-capitalist societies has not been kind.

The question really is how we make capitalism work for everyone, not just for the 1%. The recapture of economies by the top 1% is relatively recent: see e.g. graphs of the gap between CEO pay and regular worker pay from 1970 till now.

@mike @breadandcircuses There's a very clear correlation between the weakening of antitrust & consumer protections and what has happened since.
@lispi314 @breadandcircuses Yes indeed. One of the most successful things the toxic capitalists have done is mislead people into thinking that the phrase "free market" means "free from regulation" — whereas it really means "regulated in such a way as to enable free competition".