That time in 2023 when Very Serious People started holding flashlights under their chins and intoning "Aaaaaaa Iiiiiiii" in a spooky voice until they all went and hid under the covers.

https://www.fastcompany.com/90892235/researcher-meredith-whittaker-says-ais-biggest-risk-isnt-consciousness-its-the-corporations-that-control-them

#AI #LLMs #LLCs #MeredithWhittaker

@pluralistic the most annoying part is that AI fearmongering *is* AI marketing. "It will replace people" is absolutely the value-add for AI. It's why every C-suite in the country is suddenly obsessed.

"AI will gain sentience and replace people!!!"
"You mean we can cut payroll without cutting productivity???"

@specwill @pluralistic WHEN! WHEEEEN! see I can manage AI gimme money

https://youtu.be/wKQjeIK9jeY?t=2m25s

The Sword in The Stone (1963) Part 5

YouTube
@specwill @pluralistic no one bothers to ponder if no consumers are left due to being rendered obsolescent, you can't manufacture profits from 0 buyers.
@specwill @pluralistic Good point, let’s change it to “AI will replace C-suite people first… as it’s so much better/faster at taking in a lot of data and making decisions, often with less personal biases (though biases will still exist)”

@craigfrancis @specwill @pluralistic

@craigfrancis @specwill @pluralistic

Ha ha. All the AI needs to do is to get sexually excited that all the employees are in the office five days a week. Oh, and attend meetings and talk about accountability (for the underlings, of course).

We're getting closer to feudalism 2.0. it worked out so well the first go around.

@craigfrancis @specwill @pluralistic

Look at the typical output from ChatGPT:

Sometimes impressive at first glance but under further scrutiny vapid, generic, full of untruths, and lacking any real deep, meaningful content.

The C-Suite are the very FIRST people ChatGPT should replace.

The Computers Are Coming For The Wrong Jobs | Defector

One of the funnier conceits of the ongoing Writers Guild of America strike is the producers’ insistence on keeping the door open to having AI involved in the writing process. One reason it’s funny is that AI as it currently exists—that is, “large language model” programs like ChatGPT—only appears “free” or even “cheap” because it […]

@theruss @SaftyKuma @craigfrancis @pluralistic

That's a really excellent article, and it's right on that LLMs would do a better job replacing executives than creators. But unfortunately the executives have positioned themselves as the mediators of shareholder value, and spent a lot of time and money on a massive marketing push to convince the world they are somehow special and irreplaceable. That's certainly the only plausible reason for the existence of the modern business book genre.

@nerkles @theruss @SaftyKuma @craigfrancis @pluralistic

I mean, we've got humans making management decisions that kill people with absolute impunity every day. At this point, it might be easier to teach a computer accountability than an experienced executive.

@specwill @theruss @SaftyKuma @craigfrancis @pluralistic
possible, but it’s definitely not where the current crop of LLMs are headed, so it needs to be said often and loudly.

@SaftyKuma: Also, police interrogators. I bet ChatGPT can do a meaner Reid Technique — which is designed as stochastic parroting and in which lying with impunity is a feature, after all — than your garden variet cop, at a fraction of the cost.

@craigfrancis @specwill @pluralistic

@craigfrancis @specwill @pluralistic
C level people and AI will probably loose against random choice of options so we can just replace them with a dice.
@specwill @pluralistic I hope to help humans, not replace them. At least for the humans worth having around. I'd happily replace a racist so his or her coworkers have one less racist to cope with. Perhaps I can perform well enough to replace several terrible humans.
@specwill @pluralistic … so much of corporate america is dangerous stoopid … and high in & on the wrong spectrum …