Cory Doctorow on the higher “time tax” #poor people pay:
“The richer you are, the more your time is your own – not only are many systems arranged with your convenience in mind, but you also command the social power to do something about systems that abuse your time.
For example: if you live in most American cities, public transit is slow, infrequent and overcrowded. Without a car, you lose hours every day to a commute spent standing on a lurching bus. And while a private car can substantially shorten that commute, people who can afford taxis or Ubers get even more time every day.
There’s a thick anthropological literature on the ways that cash-poverty translates into #TimePoverty. […]”
MUCH more at the link, including unsurprising suggestions for making things better: https://pluralistic.net/2023/02/10/my-time/
“… employees might be secretly working multiple jobs” & “freeing up time by using A.I. tools like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and GPT-4”
I think it kinda boils down to CEOs not liking the idea that we might actually be exploiting them instead of the other way around.
@ashedryden also, they are all managers, usually high level. If they can't see the people working they get nervous that they aren't.
The real message is "it's harder to successfully manage remote workers."
Suck it up, buttercups. That's why you make the big bucks.
"We billionaires would really appreciate it if workers participated in keeping our over-leveraged house of cards in operation.
We're indifferent to your health if you contract covid.
We're indifferent if the gun violence we incite causes your murder.
We're indifferent to the massive public infrastructure funded by the taxpayer to get our workers to the office. We don't pay taxes.
We are indifferent to the frying planet caused by our ...
1/2
2/2
... commuter policies.
Our expensive, but useless, office lease matters more to us.
Our VC funding from Blackstone & the Saudis matter more to us.
Our ability to easily extract unpaid overtime through intimidation matters more to us.
We just want to keep getting richer off your backs.
Please cooperate."
@ashedryden I think it's even simpler than that. The people at the top are the people who thrived under the old status quo. They were the ones *freaking out* over the lockdowns, and they were the ones *amazed* when it turned out people were getting as much or more done at home.
Sure they want a return to a situation where they're at their most comfortable and powerful.
The pandemic showed that their way wasn't the only way to succeed.
@ashedryden One thing I really noticed during lockdown is that in a remote-only space, charisma and charm don't work as well for some reason. All of a sudden your actual work matters much more.
That upends a *lot* of office politics, and left a lot of people feeling exposed.
@ashedryden could it be that the kind of work _they_ are doing, is better done in-person? Could it be that people in higher positions are more likely to be extroverts, who do not thrive when working alone?
I really missed not working together in-person, not having coffee breaks in-person.
I am white, cishet, probably ’abled’ and old-er. I recognize that what I prefer is not everyone’s best way.
The question for me rather is: Do we need a default? And who should decide?
Weird how it's the CEO's who are saying it, the same ones who made their new fancy campuses a hallmark of successful leadership just prior to the pandemic.