@tryst @irvingpop I never understood that comic. It's been straightforward o.o
`tar czf someapp.tgz -C /opt/someapp /opt/someapp/*`
Aaa
@maxissakitsune @tryst @irvingpop I mean yeah but the relevance and context for the joke is here: https://xkcd.com/1168/
Where like, someone who uses UNIX or Linux a heavily almost assuredly knows one. They're just that commonly used, even just extracting.
As my ex remembers it: xzf stands for "xtract ze files"
@ceralor @maxissakitsune @tryst @irvingpop as someone who's switched to solely using linux for the past 2 years, i'm not defusing that bomb either
i could use the manual page for it, but graphical archive managers have existed for eons so i use that instead
@TonyYarusso @ceralor @maxissakitsune @irvingpop @tryst the only time i've ever used it is to make backups of my website, which i've only had to do like, a few times
and the next time i'm doing it it'll be automated in a bash script, meaning i'll probably type a tar command 1 more time
@ceralor @tryst @irvingpop I never realized people found tar confusing. It's not obscure, it's just old. Sometimes thinking unix is more of an archeological pursuit than a technical one. vi is descended from ed, which also spawned sed. After ed came ex (oddly, there is no sed equivalent for ex.) So if you understand the conventions of ed, the rest logically follows.
Likewise, if you consider that "tar" is "tape archive" and descended from "ar" and uses similar syntax, it all makes sense.
@ceralor @tryst @irvingpop In other words, if you understand the various conventions, the rest logically follows. While conventions do change and adapt, it doesn't mean they're any more intuitive than the older ones. (though some are, of course) Gesture-based conventions are just as unintuitive to people unfamiliar with them as clicking and dragging, or 1970s unix syntax, or vi, or emacs, or DOS.
Ultimately, it's due to the strength of the convention that it's still useful, albeit to a subset.
this is the "speak friend and enter" of the modern web
Nah, it's <Esc>ZZ ... or maybe :wqa
Vim is gnarly (but not as gnarly as Microsoft Word, which is just baroque)
@irvingpop obsidian?
I had to do that for vim commands
Looks like Obsidian
@zygous @irvingpop It is. But Vim is damn complex and I don't think it's reasonable to expect all of it inside something else that's also quite complex.
I'm amazed that it's as complete as it is, TBH.
Attached: 1 image @[email protected] I had to go back and look to see if it accepted other options, and: