NPR is the only major journalism org to have shown a spine in dealing with Musk. So he's threatened to give the NPR username to someone else.

Yet even now -- despite Musk's growing contempt for and acts against journalism -- most media organizations and their employees STILL pour their work and some of their advertising money in to his rancid site.

What will it take for journalists to wake the hell up?

https://www.npr.org/2023/05/02/1173422311/elon-musk-npr-twitter-reassign

@dangillmor @dangoodin the problem is that this alternative is not terribly mature
@kurtisj @dangillmor @dangoodin The problem is that nobody wants to be part of an alternative vanity project for brands and celebrities. If maturity makes mastodon as awful as Twitter, why have it?
@DrFriendless @kurtisj @dangillmor Isn’t the bigger problem that people aren’t willing sacrifice something they like in order to defend fundamental principles?
@dangoodin @DrFriendless @kurtisj @dangillmor I mean, make Mastodon fun and I am sure people will flock over.
@slut @DrFriendless @kurtisj @dangillmor Are you saying that people, in particular journalists whose very avocation is threatened by the Twitter menace, should not follow a moral imperative to leave unless or until there's a place they like as much as Twitter?

@dangoodin @slut @kurtisj @dangillmor No not at all. I'm saying that journalists aren't leaving because they feel they have an audience on Twitter, be it ever so and increasingly deplorable. And because mastodon can't deliver them an audience which is centralised and captive they don't see the value in it. I feel if you ask a journalist or a politician or an advertiser to choose between morality or an audience, they will always choose the audience.

And the problem is that one of the things I love about mastodon is that I am not a captive audience for all of those egotists. And I don't wish mastodon to ever evolve into that. I would like mastodon to be a place where I follow those that I respect.

Mastodon is a peaceful village square, Twitter is Times Square where you are imprisoned in stocks and buffoons shout at you. When everyone is in the village square, what will the buffoons do?

@DrFriendless @slut @kurtisj @dangillmor Sounds like you and I agree that Twitter is a lost cause that’s beyond redemption. My question was directed instead at those who refuse to do the right thing and dump Twitter simply because there is no alternative that has the same bells and whistles.

@DrFriendless @dangoodin @slut @kurtisj @NateSilver538
Is Mastodon a peaceful village square because it is inherently morally better, because it is more flexible, or because it hasn't become as popular so far?

For all the problems that could appear on Twitter, I had a curated feed that mostly (but not entirely) was comfortable. I was occasionally challenged, but I never had to deal with outright abuse. Maybe this is partly from being a cis white male, but I'm not sure how easily my name translates to that, and my avatar is a South American llama.

@DrFriendless @dangoodin @slut @kurtisj @NateSilver538

Many of whose who have stuck their neck out further than I have dared have come under fire. Part of that is undoubtedly because Twitter is a single realm. There are ways for Mastodon instance operators and I think individual users to block entire other instances. But what if mastodon.social or other major server becomes a problematic instance? It's not that easy to block without losing the platform, and we have Twitter Redux.

@DrFriendless @dangoodin @slut @kurtisj @NateSilver538

We have routinely seen new platforms coopted by everyone from edgelords to outright Nazis with varying levels of success, and I am skeptical that Mastodon as a platform is immune from that. It has the additional challenge that it's not hard to create an official-ish looking presence. Every time I look for someone I followed on Twitter, I get back half a dozen servers that apparently automatically repost anything tweeted by an equivalent Twitter account. It's not hard to slide in some fake stuff under that name. It's going to take a lot of work to avoid undermining the entire platform without establishing a new per-domain presence.

@jarrodfrates @DrFriendless @dangoodin @slut @kurtisj @NateSilver538 Excellent points. It is possible to resolves some of these, yes? Especially if more supporters migrated here. Granted, 0 will never be reached, but could do better than Twitter is, and perhaps has. (Or is this ‘blind faith’ ;) )

@jarrodfrates @DrFriendless @dangoodin @slut @kurtisj @NateSilver538

U mean the typical violence of Twitter comments is bad?

@DrFriendless @dangoodin @slut @kurtisj @dangillmor “I feel if you ask a journalist or a politician or an advertiser to choose between morality or an audience, they will always choose the audience.” Good point!
@raaphorst @DrFriendless @dangoodin @slut @kurtisj @dangillmor Add scientists to that list. (And I’m a scientist, albeit frustrated by loyalty of other scientists remaining there).
@DrFriendless @dangoodin @slut @kurtisj @dangillmor Mastodon might be genteel etc but the audience is still largely there. And compare Sudan conversation on Mastodon (almost nonexistent) with what's going on on Twitter (plenty analysis, people coordinate plans for aid to people in need, etc). In fact Sudan updates are one of the few reasons I open Twitter these days.
@DrFriendless @dangoodin @slut @kurtisj @dangillmor Twitter is a never ending bar fight.
@thelastpinkcar dangerous bars rarely go out of business where I live.

@lzvolk @thelastpinkcar @DrFriendless @dangoodin @kurtisj @dangillmor All walks of people want to be at a bar, to watch the spectacle, to engage and exchange cross-culturally. Not many people want to feel policed by hall monitors 24/7 with a bent towards a specific monoculture. Especially, when the hall monitors tend to favor a specific group of people with implicit biases.

People are multifaceted and most folks don't have one special interest. Plenty of people from Twitter I knew used it professionally while also interacting with fandoms, spoke about fashion, and followed real-time political happenings. I don't really see BTS groups going viral or queer fashion mastodon blowing up. When this point is made, it is usually disregarded by white men who are focused more so on banging their heads against compilers than questioning how people can scratch their pop culture itch in a rewarding way here.

I understand the argument of wanting to have a safe and peaceful platform to engage in, I really do. I would just beg people to have the self-awareness that they shouldn't be moralizing the usage of hellsites simply because people like to engage in the zeitgeist differently than they do.

It reeks of elitism.

@DrFriendless @dangoodin @slut @kurtisj @dangillmor The “audience” card is played by many science experts, too. Which, as I mentioned earlier, removes a notch on my respect for them. (And I’m a scientist.)

@dangoodin @slut @DrFriendless @kurtisj @dangillmor

Need a donations-based alternative to Twitter

Journalists getting their share depending on how many clicks they get

@dangoodin @slut @DrFriendless @kurtisj @dangillmor it's building followers again that people hate, takes forever. Even accounts with over a million followers often have small engagement.
@dangoodin @slut @DrFriendless @kurtisj @dangillmor Again. That is a common response for staying on Twitter, even scientists. Nor, in my opinion, is it a valid justification and substitution for loyalty to the site. Loyalty to Twitter is allegiance to Musk.

@slut @dangoodin @DrFriendless @kurtisj @dangillmor

the most important is to take away the subscription for blue checks

Without it Twitter would be ok

@dangoodin @DrFriendless @kurtisj @dangillmor I’m glad I’m not the only one that thinks this, too.
@DrFriendless @kurtisj @dangillmor @dangoodin I get what you're saying, and your statement has validity.