For the first time ever, I’m torn about whether I should stay on mastodon.social.

Being here has given me a voice I’ve never had, to talk about a topic that I feel strongly about, and I feel I’ve made the world a slightly different place.

But I also wonder if mastodon.social is becoming even more hostile to the rest of the Fediverse.

Should I stay and fight? Or is this a lost cause?

I talk to lots of devs, server admins, and users—and the trend has been that Mastodon’s BDFL approach is actively harming the rest of the Fediverse.

Community safety features haven’t been implemented in years.

Aspects of ActivityPub aren’t utilized or they’re kneecapped even though they’ve been present since the very beginning.

Things that are possible elsewhere on the Fediverse aren’t possible on Mastodon.

Here’s what especially bothers me.

Nomadic identity already exists on the Fediverse. @evan, who co-authored ActivityPub, has said it is possible.

@mike has made a protocol that does nomadic identity, and he’s building a Fediverse Identity Manager too.

#Calckey allows you to not just migrate but import your posts.

I wouldn’t mind mastodon.social being the default server if Mastodon has nomadic identity.

But it doesn’t.

On this point, even #Bluesky has an advantage here.

I’ve said for awhile that, when it comes to the Fediverse, people have myopia regarding the possibilities of ActivityPub and are focusing too much on Mastodon.

Partly, that’s because once you’re in Mastodon, it’s very hard to know about the Fediverse outside of it.

As a result, people who use Mastodon think the Fediverse is Mastodon.

We’re at the point where Mastodon clients are actively hostile about server apps that aren’t Mastodon—despite using Mastodon’s API.

And it’s questionable to me whether or not Mastodon’s API should be the “standard”.

The Fediverse shouldn’t be a competition. Yet, I feel the Fediverse is becoming more hostile to people who don’t use Mastodon.

One thing that gets me is all the folks who say, “We need to spread Mastodon—and then after they join Mastodon, they’ll be sold on the Fediverse.”

Frankly, I’m skeptical about that approach.

I’ve looked through the stats. Few people migrate to other parts of the Fediverse after joining Mastodon.

Mastodon is 80% of the Fediverse.

It’s closest competitor is Misskey—and Misskey is 3% of the Fediverse.

This despite that Misskey is in many ways superior to Mastodon in terms of usability.

For awhile, I was okay with Mastodon being 80% of the Fediverse.

I was also okay with a campaign like @spreadmastodon.

But now I’m wondering: will servers that *aren’t* mastodon.social benefit from this campaign?

Have we gone from Mastodon dominating the Fediverse to now mastodon.social dominating it too?

This is not an irrational fear.

Despite my worries, I have some hope about the current state of the Fediverse.

1. @mammoth was right to default to its own app-specific server—I was wrong. Other app developers should follow suit

2. The *key apps are growing very fast, especially in Japan—but also in the West too

3. There’s Bluesky—so if ActivityPub fails to decentralize, AT protocol is an option

Mastodon is not *yet* the only option.

What’s become apparent to me it’s not enough to advocate for Mastodon and call it a day.

Decentralization is going to be a fight within the Fediverse too.

Not everyone on Mastodon wants decentralization. Instead, they want Mastodon to “win”—and “winning” means crushing everything else.

@atomicpoet centralized platforms is what led to birdsites downfall.

they want Mastodon to “win”—and “winning” means crushing everything else.

Was surprised but then not so surprised. Considering a Pleroma fork is quietly and subtly never mentioned among the choices available.

@atomicpoet as long as I am able to get posts by "@press.coop" folks/outfits, I am happy and will continue with #Mastodon. Is it bad I don't care aside from that?

@atomicpoet I was having similar thoughts just recently ... in thinking about developer/advocate activity since "the migration".

The thought was: could it have been a fundamental mistake to accept mastodon as the de facto platform rather than embracing or building an ecosystem *for* platforms.

The key for me, was that as mastodon was/is so dominant, to not act at the platform level, and build tools/software for a diverse platform ecosystem, was to accept/cause the centralisation you speak of.

@atomicpoet this might be an overstatement.

There is no way an #opensource project could be everything to everyone. #Mastodon will not be the exception.

There will be some people who would use it and some others who would use something else, including many forks which may start from Mastodon itself.

I believe all the innovation going on the #Fediverse applications is where the actual success is. 😊